Programmer Humor

32410 readers

379 users here now

Post funny things about programming here! (Or just rant about your favourite programming language.)

Rules:

Posts must be relevant to programming, programmers, or computer science.
No NSFW content.
Jokes must be in good taste. No hate speech, bigotry, etc.

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

AgreeableLandscape@lemmy.ml

cat_programmer@lemmy.ml

522

Angry programmers noise getting louder and louder (lemmy.world)

submitted 8 months ago by devilish666@lemmy.world to c/programmerhumor@lemmy.ml

84 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] KittyCat@lemmy.world 34 points 8 months ago (1 children)

HTML5 + CSS3 is Turing complete, but just basic html is not.

[–] jackpot@lemmy.ml 8 points 8 months ago (3 children)

how does something get tested for turing completeness

[–] NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone 39 points 8 months ago (1 children)

You port Doom to it.

[–] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 8 points 8 months ago

Or linux.

[–] fleckenstein@social.lizzy.rs 11 points 8 months ago (1 children)

@jackpot @KittyCat implementing a brainfuck interpreter for it is a useful method

[–] frezik@midwest.social 5 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Just about the only good reason for Brainfuck.

[–] fleckenstein@social.lizzy.rs 3 points 8 months ago (1 children)

@frezik I mean that's literally it's purpose. being a minimal turing complete language.

[–] frezik@midwest.social 14 points 8 months ago

I could be wrong, but I don't think the creators envisioned it being a basis for easily proving the Turing Completeness of other languages, but it did. They were more thinking "how can I have the most fucked up language in the smallest package and still be Turning Complete?"

[–] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 10 points 8 months ago

By building a simulated Turing machine, usually... or at least by demonstrating that all the components to do so are available.