this post was submitted on 05 Mar 2024
52 points (93.3% liked)

Asklemmy

43397 readers
1117 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy ๐Ÿ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

When they say that "they have an army of lawyers" or that Disney has more lawyers than animators and things like that, do they tho? Is an army of lawyers really effective? Do companies actually have an "army" of lawyers to redact and sign documents?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Yep. I use ChatGPT myself to help with research on coding and other issues.

I don't expect AI is going to replace humans anytime soon, but the use of it is going to be an essential skill, and people and companies who don't learn how will definitely go extinct.

[โ€“] oxjox@lemmy.ml 1 points 6 months ago

It is most certainly already replacing some humans. One example is some video content now being generated by AI rather than a digital artist; same for stock photos.

All mechanization and automation is designed to aid or replace humans. In some cases it's about safety or about effort. But ultimately, it's about a company increasing their profitability. Profits will motivate adoption.