Formula 1

9140 readers

4 users here now

Welcome to Formula1 @ Lemmy.world Lemmy's largest community for Formula 1 and related racing series

Rules

Be respectful to everyone; drivers, lemmings, redditors etc
No gambling, crypto or NFTs
Spoilers are allowed
Non English articles should include a translation in the comments by deepl.com or similar
Paywalled articles should include at least a brief summary in the comments, the wording of the article should not be altered
Social media posts should be posted as screenshots with a link for those who want to view it
Memes are allowed on Monday only as we all do like a laugh or 2, but don’t want to become formuladank.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

submitted 10 months ago by omgarm@feddit.nl to c/formula1@lemmy.world

30 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] GeneralEmergency@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Sounds like you have some important information about the case. Maybe you should share with the proper authorities.

[–] TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Well... yeah? If he's guilty of course most would want him sacked for it

Added emphasis because clearly you missed that very important word.

If he's guilty. If. I never claimed to have any insider knowledge at all, that's just a strawman you made up to get angry at.

Am I to assume if he's guilty you wouldn't want him sacked? That's kinda fucked up.

[–] TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world 0 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Can you confirm, do you know what 'if' means? Yes, no?

E: that's a no then.

And being against people being sacked in the event of them being found guilty of sexually harassing employees? Yikes.