Asklemmy

44148 readers

1285 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

Open-ended question
Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

Lemmyverse: community search
sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
!lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

221

What is something that gets a lot of hate for absolutely no reason? (midwest.social)

submitted 9 months ago by Lanky_Pomegranate530@midwest.social to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml

475 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Thorny_Insight@lemm.ee 24 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (4 children)

Dispassionate takes on controversial issues.

There's always atleast two sides to each story and more often than not the truth is somewhere in the middle. If you think something is clear-cut you're almost guranteed to be mistaken and misinformed and many of your dearest beliefs are totally wrong.

[–] ReCursing@kbin.social 24 points 9 months ago (1 children)

There is, of course, a relevant xkcd - it's yesterday's https://xkcd.com/2898/

[–] blindsight@beehaw.org 1 points 9 months ago

Oh, that's brilliant. I hadn't seen that one yet. The alt text is great, too.

[–] peter@feddit.uk 10 points 9 months ago (2 children)

I think social media, particularly Twitter, has bred this. Twitter is designed in a way that makes it impossible to have an actual structured debate and instead encourages short and unambiguous statements which cannot possibly accurately encapsulate an issue

[–] cobra89@beehaw.org 8 points 9 months ago (1 children)

encourages short and unambiguous statements which cannot possibly accurately encapsulate an issue

Conservatives in a nutshell. (I'll add the /s here for anyone not getting the joke that I'm doing the exact thing we're talking about)

[–] blindsight@beehaw.org 3 points 9 months ago

I needed that /s, lol.

Because isn't that literally what conservatives do? Pick wedge issues then make quick soundbites about "common sense" "solutions" that align with simple black & white thinking and conservative values?

[–] Bitrot@lemmy.sdf.org 5 points 9 months ago

Yes, social media has destroyed nuance. Recognizing that a person can understand a position without believing that position is also gone. And people are often performing for likes and “ratio” and discussing in bad faith and being intentionally obtuse in the hopes of getting more attention.

[–] fruitycoder@sh.itjust.works 2 points 9 months ago

I've taken to letting people know my opinion that if they are omicient they are wasting their talent arguing about piddly topics with subjectives like myself

[–] ULS@lemmy.ml 1 points 9 months ago

Dispassionate? Could there be a better word? I think I know and agree with what your saying but I don't think that's the correct word.