this post was submitted on 12 Aug 2023
57 points (100.0% liked)

Casual UK

2132 readers
1 users here now

Casual UK

A casual place for banter and anything that doesn't fit in anywhere else.

Have chat and a natter. Talk about anything and everything.

Keep it casual.

Rules

Other communities:

Here:

Elsewhere:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] too_high_for_this@sh.itjust.works 26 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Ignoring the joke, that's exactly how Yellowstone was fixed. We killed all the wolves, and then massive populations of elk and deer ate fucking everything. Forests died because no seedlings survived. Once we reintroduced the wolves, they kept the herds' numbers lower and the woodlands came back.

TL;DR: Wolves

[โ€“] that_ginger_one@feddit.uk 11 points 1 year ago

AFAIK that's one half of the story, but the other is something quite technical and cool in zoology that wasn't foreseen by ecologists at the time wolves were eradicated.

The wolves being removed caused something called meso-predator release, whereby the coyote numbers in the Yellowstone surged because of the cross over in prey species and lack of competition for that prey. BUT, that meant species not shared with wolves had their numbers heavily reduced by the increase in coyotes, mainly beavers.

When beaver numbers plummeted so did dams along the Yellowstone, and the the water level of the river went down and I think sped up, and that reduced areas for all animals and vegetative growth along the whole river. Reintroducing wolves caused coyote numbers to stabilise back at regular levels, beaver numbers did the same and the river stared to go back normal causing a huge bounce back across the board. Including reducing deer numbers back as coyotes don't hunt them so they did the opposite of beavers when wolves were removed for the same reason.... Meso-predator release but in the opposite direction.