this post was submitted on 11 Feb 2024
102 points (100.0% liked)

TechTakes

1641 readers
118 users here now

Big brain tech dude got yet another clueless take over at HackerNews etc? Here's the place to vent. Orange site, VC foolishness, all welcome.

This is not debate club. Unless it’s amusing debate.

For actually-good tech, you want our NotAwfulTech community

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

(via mastodon)

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] papertowels@lemmy.one 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Any thoughts on how you'd define real?

[–] saucerwizard@awful.systems 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Non-woo, actually does something good.

[–] papertowels@lemmy.one -5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Yes, how would you define "does something good"? Live another year?

What it boils down to this: can you provide a concrete example of a metric that you'd accept as proof that it actually does something good? If not, then you're just setting up a moving goal, and saying "bring me a rock"

[–] V0ldek@awful.systems 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's exactly what scientists are supposed to do. You can't ask a random person on a forum to come up with a solid experiment setting...

Let me rephrase the original question: are there any solid, peer-reviewed studies, that have looked into life-extension and concluded a positive effect?

[–] papertowels@lemmy.one -4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

I can ask a random person on a forum asking about arbitrary levels of "realness" to solidify what they mean.

Maybe I wasn't clear. I'm not asking for metrics that prove, without a doubt that something works. That is clearly what scientists should be doing, not, as we agree, a random person on the internet.

I'm asking for what metrics OP would accept as evidence that would convince them something works. That is something that scientists would not have a say in.

Would peer reviewed papers qualify? Would a random blogpost? Where is their bar set for things that would actually change their mind?

I'm actually not sure where the line is drawn for "life extension", and would appreciate your two cents. Does a healthy diet, regular exercise, and ample sleep fall under that in your experience? Why or why not?

I know this guy does a lot of super off the wall techy stuff, but the foundation of what he focuses on seems to be pursuing these things (diet, sleep, exercise) with militaristic discipline.

[–] dgerard@awful.systems 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

this is expressly not debate club

[–] sc_griffith@awful.systems 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

most sealion shit I've seen in a while

[–] papertowels@lemmy.one -2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Haha yeah, my b, I came here from browsing all and didn't realize that was a rhetorical question and that y'all are just here to vent.

[–] sc_griffith@awful.systems 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

it doesn't seem necessarily rhetorical, you just don't have anything of substance to respond with. people don't like you jerking off in their replies

[–] self@awful.systems 5 points 1 year ago