this post was submitted on 10 Feb 2024
1149 points (95.8% liked)

Political Memes

5431 readers
2430 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] doctorcrimson@lemmy.today 1 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Also, the river probably doesn't suit the transportation of goods necessary for high population densities. Maybe an underground rail?

[–] HerbalGamer@sh.itjust.works 4 points 9 months ago (1 children)

You do realise rivers have been our highways for thousands of years?

[–] doctorcrimson@lemmy.today -4 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Okay, pal, go ahead and transport 30,000 kilos of produce upriver within the next 2 days 16 times and tell me how efficient this river idea works out.

Spoiler: It's gonna be terrible.

[–] HerbalGamer@sh.itjust.works 3 points 9 months ago (1 children)
[–] doctorcrimson@lemmy.today -2 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

I don't think the Goudvis cargo ship's 18 Meter Width is going to fit in the canal depicted above in Utrecht, just a hunch. I can't speak for this cargo ship specifically but cargo ships in general are incapable of going upriver.

[–] HerbalGamer@sh.itjust.works 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Feel free to nitpick this random image I got from the internet somewhere, but if you're really that worried; there's still a road next to the canal.

[–] doctorcrimson@lemmy.today -2 points 9 months ago

You're complaining that I gave your low effort reply a decent counter argument? I feel like that's a you problem.

[–] MetaCubed@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago (1 children)

The dutch have more than one road (surprising, I know). Removing the eyesore won't impact their shipping and transport

[–] doctorcrimson@lemmy.today 0 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

Removing a 4 or 6 way interchange absolutely would impact shipping and transport, which is why I suggested underground rail as a replacement.

[–] MetaCubed@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

As neither of us are civil engineers, I'm going to stick with my intuition on this until you can provide proof of impact.

[–] doctorcrimson@lemmy.today -1 points 9 months ago

You have no idea of my titles, but thanks for reiterating that you have no idea what you're talking about.