Technology

59692 readers

3932 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

975

Just 137 crypto miners use 2.3% of total U.S. power — government now requiring commercial miners to report energy consumption (www.tomshardware.com)

submitted 9 months ago by misk@sopuli.xyz to c/technology@lemmy.world

271 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Badeendje@lemmy.world 120 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Electricity is too cheap for these uses.

[–] aniki@lemm.ee 104 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Why is commercial power so cheap and residential so expensive? We could fix two problems by balancing that back.

[–] Nighed@sffa.community 28 points 9 months ago (1 children)

My understanding is tha some commercial/industrial users will get a highly variable tariff. This may be cheaper much of the time, but can get ridiculously expensive at times of high demand.

The difference is that a bitcoin farmer can shut down at those expensive times, but a home user still needs to heat/cool their house, run their fridge etc, so the savings cancel out. Because of this, averaging the costs works out easier/better for most home consumers

[–] frezik@midwest.social 11 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (2 children)

You can get time of use billing at home with many power companies. Only makes sense if you have solar panels or storage batteries or some such.

[–] st3ph3n@midwest.social 10 points 9 months ago

I have real time pricing from my utility. It works out well because we charge 2 electric cars overnight for a fraction of what they would cost to charge at the standard fixed kilowatt-hour rate. My house is heated by natural gas; I don't think the savings would be there if I also was heating my house with electricity as I live in the midwest, where it gets cold as fuck for the winter.

[–] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago

My Volt (and I assume other EVs) has a setting to charge when power is cheaper.

[–] Deceptichum@kbin.social 2 points 9 months ago (3 children)

Because companies > people in the eyes of the state.

[–] joekar1990@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

Something something job creators….something something trickle down

[–] just_another_person@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

It depends on which state, which is even more sad.

[–] General_Effort@lemmy.world 0 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

It's more like companies = jobs in the eyes of voters.

ETA: What's with the downvotes? You guys think this is wrong?

[–] aniki@lemm.ee 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I have never once gave a flying fuck about a nebulous concept of "jobs."

[–] General_Effort@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Sounds like you are in a very good position to appreciate how the average voter feels about this.

ETA: I think we'd all be better off if people had a more realistic and practical attitude to jobs.