Asklemmy

43403 readers

1221 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

Open-ended question
Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

Lemmyverse: community search
sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
!lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

What are your experiences with the Mandela Effect? (lemmy.ml)

submitted 7 months ago by gianni@lemmy.ml to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml

70 comments fedilink hide all child comments

See title. For those who don’t know, the Mandela Effect is a phenomenon where a large group of people remember something differently than how it occurred. It’s named after Nelson Mandela because a significant number of people remembered him dying in prison in the 1980s, even though he actually passed away in 2013.

I’m curious to hear about your personal experiences with this phenomenon. Have you ever remembered an event, fact, or detail that turned out to be different from reality? What was it and how did you react when you found out your memory didn’t align with the facts? Does it happen often?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] frightful_hobgoblin@lemmy.ml 8 points 7 months ago (2 children)

similarly: some people say "visa versa"

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago

That's an expecially bad one! (I knew a lawyer who said that lol)

[–] pmk@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

The romans pronounced it "uike uersa" or "wike wersa" (two syllables for each word). The letter "c" was always a k-sound, and "v" was like our "u", it was the same letter for a long time. So another example, if you want to say "Veni vidi vici" the historically accurate way would be "Weni widi wiki".

[–] frightful_hobgoblin@lemmy.ml 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

How do you know?

[–] pmk@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 7 months ago

It's been thoroughly researched by linguists. The main source is the pronounciation guides written by the romans themselves. They describe how to trill the R's and how to say diphtongs etc, and compare latin pronounciation with the letters of other languages, mainly greek.