this post was submitted on 31 Jan 2024
469 points (93.0% liked)

politics

19072 readers
3727 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Nobody@lemmy.world 154 points 9 months ago (3 children)

"Donald Trump and his far-right 'holy war' against Taylor Swift could cost him the next presidential election."

News from a completely normal and not broken at all timeline. Imagine reading that sentence to someone 10 years ago.

[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 76 points 9 months ago (1 children)

10 years ago was still 2 years left in the final Obama administration. Add on just a bit more to really drive those 2014 people crazy:

“After an unsuccessful violent insurrection to stay in the White House after being voted out, Donald Trump and his far-right ‘holy war’ against Taylor Swift could cost him the next presidential election.”

[–] zzzz@lemmy.world 27 points 9 months ago (2 children)

We're about 80% of the way to Idiocracy.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 33 points 9 months ago (1 children)

We're past Idiocracy. President Camacho listened to the smartest person in the room. Trump thinks he is the smartest person in the room.

[–] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 10 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Trump knows he's not the smartest person in the room. Trump wants to claim to be the smartest person in the room, and enjoys watching nobody correct him. That makes him feel like the most powerful person in the room. He doesn't care who the smartest is, as long as he gets to claim it and all the credit for everything smarter people do near him.

[–] Nightwingdragon@lemmy.world 5 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Nitpick: He's gone on record as saying he doesn't hire people who he thinks is smarter than he is.

[–] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

That's part of the kink. He says that so that smart people who want to work for him will tell him they think he is smarter than they are. It's a power move. Like the handshake thing.

[–] BackOnMyBS@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago

After I got out of a relationship with a malignant narcissist, I realized that everything they do and say is a power move. They live in a world without objective reality. They cannot tell the truth because they function for a delusion. While you are thinking that you're having a conversation sharing ideas, they're observing you up and down to measure your strengths, weaknesses, social power, and threat to their social power. They listen intently to create a character they will present to you so that you enmesh with them. They run little secret experiments to learn how you react to things. Once they've figured you out, you're going to have a bad time. The sad thing is that underlying all this, is that they feel deeply insecure. They confuse envy for love. The more of an asshole a malignant narcissist is, the more they're telling the world they're insecure because the more they want people to envy them, which means the more they need love in their delusional world. Trump is extraordinarily insecure.

[–] JasonDJ@lemmy.zip 3 points 9 months ago

When you’re a star, they let you do it. You can do anything.

[–] littlebluespark@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago

That's being generous...

[–] Conyak@lemmy.tf 14 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I feel like that headline would be completely normal during the 80s satanic witch hunt.

[–] Daxtron2@startrek.website 12 points 9 months ago

I think they'd be confused about why a real estate celebrity is going after a 1 year old girl but yeah not too far off