this post was submitted on 24 Jan 2024
138 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37717 readers
415 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Google is spoon-feeding fake “Shark Tank approved” weight loss gummy candies to innocent people — and making money doing it.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 30p87@feddit.de 25 points 9 months ago (3 children)

uBlock on Firefox based browsers works everywhere btw.

[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 50 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

uBlock Origin on Firefox.

Do not use uBlock. Not the same thing.

[–] 30p87@feddit.de 11 points 9 months ago (1 children)

What is just uBlock anyway? Kagi only shows uBlock origin for me when I search for "uBlock"

[–] saigot@lemmy.ca 27 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

So the creator of ublock found he had taken on more than he could handle and transferred ownership of ublock to someone else. That project stopped getting updated and was eventually acquired by Adblockplus which is a for profit company that lets advertisers pay to be whitelisted.

Ublock origin is from the original creator of ublock and was original intended as his personal version of the extension free of the responsibilities he agreed to with ublock.

[–] tesseract@beehaw.org 7 points 9 months ago

I can't imagine the temptations and harassments he faces over this extension. There's no way he's having an easy life being the target of the big bad tech.

[–] Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Sort of a non-solution for the wider problem isn’t it?

[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 15 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

I actually think the "solution" is in this article right here.

I think people have been slowly waking up to internet advertising


  1. Not being as good as it used to be in bringing in new/repeat customers
  2. That generally the benefits and utility are failing because of the swamps of scam ads.

Ads are basically the only profitable part of Google, and it's ripe for a new search-model to undermine its now old-and-busted algorithms that are only surfacing AI-produced garbage and for a new ad-competitor that produces an ad-experience that people won't turn on adblockers for.

That was the original promise of AdBlock Plus, that they would make deals with advertisers who agreed to standards that made the ads non-intrusive and clear they were an ad.

I'm not against ads, I'm against an ad industry that thinks we owe them viewing their advertising. No, viewing advertising is a choice it's not a legal requirement for us to use the service, to click on ads and buy things.

If the ad industry could shape up, I wouldn't need uBlock Origin or a Pi-Hole.

There's an opportunity, someone just have to have the capital and take the chance.

[–] aniki@lemm.ee 2 points 9 months ago

I'd probably still use PiHole but maybe ditch UBO.

[–] tesseract@beehaw.org 5 points 9 months ago

Sort of a non-solution for the wider problem isn’t it?

Honestly, I was wondering what people here are talking about. uBO is so effective that you don't notice either its presence or the ads it blocks. uBO might be a real effective solution for the problems you mention - until enough people use and start hurting Google's revenue. Even if it does, uBO is a necessary defense since Google ads are obnoxious and potentially harmful.

[–] Car@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 9 months ago (3 children)

Ironically, there’s no easy way to block ads on a modern Apple device. You know, Google’s competition?

[–] derbis@beehaw.org 9 points 9 months ago (1 children)

? Firefox plus ublock origin works fine on the Mac. Unless you mean ios only?

[–] greenteadrinker@midwest.social 8 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Probably iOS. I use AdGuard and sideload a YouTube tweak to dodge most of the ads on my browsing experience

[–] Car@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 9 months ago

Yeah, I should have clarified IOS. Their phones and tablets are locked down with jailbreaks few and far between.

[–] ApathyTree@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 9 months ago

It’s not super easy but a pihole, with a vpn to always have your device on your home network, isn’t that difficult or time consuming to set up, and will block shit network-wide. No ads in apps, browsers, smart tv firmware, etc. unless it’s hosted within the same domain the content is accessed through (like Amazon's trash).

I’ve used that setup for years and it’s wonderful.

[–] megopie@beehaw.org 4 points 9 months ago

Firefox focus on IOS blocks all Google ads in my experience. There are some it doesn’t get but they’re not through AdSense