this post was submitted on 09 Aug 2023
369 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37717 readers
375 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:

This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
alyaza@beehaw.org
TheRtRevKaiser@beehaw.org
gyrfalcon@beehaw.org
rs5th@beehaw.org
coldredlight@beehaw.org
Los@beehaw.org
SemioticStandard@beehaw.org
TheRtRevKaiser@kbin.social
remington@beehaw.org
369
Google says AI systems should be able to mine publishers’ work unless companies opt out, turning copyright law on its head (www.theguardian.com)
submitted 1 year ago by 0x815@feddit.de to c/technology@beehaw.org
177 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

In its submission to the Australian government’s review of the regulatory framework around AI, Google said that copyright law should be altered to allow for generative AI systems to scrape the internet.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] argv_minus_one@beehaw.org 15 points 1 year ago (3 children)

This is artificial pseudointelligence, not a person. It doesn't learn about or transform anything.

[–] Gutless2615@ttrpg.network 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Im not the one anthropomorphising the technology here.

[–] jarfil@beehaw.org 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

To take those statements seriously, you will need to:

  • define and describe in detail the processes by which "a person" learns
  • define and describe in detail how "a person" transforms anything
  • define and describe in detail what is "intelligence"
  • define and describe in detail what these "artificial paeudointelligences" are doing
  • define and describe in detail the differences between the latter and the previous points

Otherwise, I'll claim that "a person" is running exactly the same processes (neural networks, LLMs, hallucinations), and that calling these AIs "artificial paeudointelligences" is nothing else than dehumanizing a minority just because you feel threatened by them.

[–] acastcandream@beehaw.org 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

spoilerasdfasdfsadfasfasdf