this post was submitted on 16 Jan 2024
307 points (96.7% liked)

Gaming

20021 readers
343 users here now

Sub for any gaming related content!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] teawrecks@sopuli.xyz 1 points 10 months ago (3 children)

Just want to highlight how unnecessarily antagonistic your response was. Not sure if that was your intention, but I don't care to engage with it. Cheers.

[–] wildginger@lemmy.myserv.one 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)
[–] teawrecks@sopuli.xyz -1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

If you think I've been antagonistic, please let me know how. I'm here to have a productive discussion, but so far I'm here by myself.

[–] wildginger@lemmy.myserv.one 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

You could start by actually making an attempt at good faith discussion, instead of pedantic attempts to hide from the point.

But we both know you dont want to do that, because youre not actually here for productive discussion.

[–] teawrecks@sopuli.xyz 1 points 10 months ago

I respectfully disagreed with the top level post, and stated facts about why. If that was interpreted as not in good faith, I'm sorry, and I'm open to any counter arguments. So far, two people have pointed out that physical media can't remotely have their licenses revoked, and I agree, that is relevant to the discussion. If you have anything relevant you'd like to contribute, I'm all ears.

[–] YeetPics@mander.xyz 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

antagonistic

You're replying to everyone in this thread with half-assed insults and underhanded comments and then playing victim and complaining about how "nobody wants to discuss this in good faith".

[–] teawrecks@sopuli.xyz 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

If you think I’ve been antagonistic, please let me know how.

[–] YeetPics@mander.xyz 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I think you're a passive aggressive blowhard. I don't think you're being antagonistic although I could picture you wanting to be if that makes sense.

[–] teawrecks@sopuli.xyz 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)

although I could picture you wanting to be if that makes sense.

From my perspective, it sounds like you're reading my posts with an unwarranted intention behind them. I have to assume this stems from you disagreeing with what I am saying, but to my knowledge, nothing I've said is incorrect. If you could point to something I've said that's incorrect, I'd be glad to discuss it. Also, if you could refrain from the namecalling, that would also be appreciated.

[–] YeetPics@mander.xyz 1 points 10 months ago

Long winded and pointless. Very consistent.

[–] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 0 points 10 months ago

Blunt rejection of scolding is not where the problem started.