this post was submitted on 09 Aug 2023
694 points (99.0% liked)

News

23268 readers
2566 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Ohio voters on Tuesday resoundingly rejected a Republican-backed measure that would have made it more difficult to change the state’s constitution, setting up a fall campaign that will become the nation’s latest referendum on abortion rights since the U.S. Supreme Court overturned nationwide protections last year.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] FoxBJK@midwest.social 82 points 1 year ago (3 children)

From my city's Democrat group:

What landmark changes to Ohio law would have FAILED under Issue 1?

In just the 21st century:

  • 2000: Clean Ohio Fund; state can sell enviro bonds (57% in favor...would have FAILED)
  • 2005: Third Frontier program to modernize Ohio's economy (54% in favor...would have FAILED)
  • 2006: Increasing minimum wage (57% in favor...would have FAILED)
  • 2009: Legalizing gambling at casinos in Cbus, CLE, Cincy, Toledo (53% in favor...would have FAILED)
  • 2015: Barring businesses from using amendment process to form monopolies (51% in favor...would have FAILED)

Let's go further back now:

  • 1923: Remove the phrase “white male” from parts of the constitution describing VOTER ELIGIBILITY (56% in favor...would have FAILED)
  • 1933: Giving counties authority to create city charters with "home rule" (53% in favor...would have failed)
  • 1933: Set the 10-mill property tax limit that local governments can impose without getting approval from voters (59.7% in favor...would have FAILED)
  • 1949: Ending the practice of straight-ticket voting; voters must mark their candidates, not just check off a party (57% in favor...would have failed)
  • 1953: Creation of Ohio state school board, which advises local school districts on education policy (57% in favor...would have failed)
  • 1953: Allowing People of Color to serve in the Ohio National Guard (57% in favor...would have failed)
  • 1961: Allowing Women to serve in Ohio National Guard (50.1% in favor...would have failed)
  • 1975: Allowing charitable orgs to run bingo games, a form of gambling (54% in favor...would have failed)
  • 1978: Prison labor reform (54% in favor...would have failed)
  • 1982: Enabled lower-interest, first-time home-buyer programs that continue today (57% in favor...would have failed)
  • 1990: Tax credits and other steps to help finance housing projects (53% in favor...would have failed)
[–] MajesticSloth@lemmy.world 27 points 1 year ago

This is some great perspective on its effect, thank you.

[–] JJROKCZ@lemmy.world 23 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So basically everything good in the last century wouldve failed and this law would’ve ensured Ohio would slide into the same useless bucket as Alabama on the national scale

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago

That’s what they’re trying now. Ohio is a major state, with multiple major cities, and a long history as a swing state due to being roughly even rural/urban. Like Columbus is really queer, Cleveland is just as Great Lakes as Toronto, Detroit, and Chicago, and we’ve also got Appalachia and a lot of what you probably can’t tell isn’t rural Indiana. Add in that Columbus is a major hub for business and it’s very valuable and perceived as takable.

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Man looking at some of these with the years next to them and Ohio used to be kinda based

And yeah there are other things that may desperately need to be changed about our constitution that wouldn’t clear the 60% mark even beyond abortion. Namely our constitution currently prohibits recognition of gay marriage, which while no longer an issue in the Obergefell era, may become relevant again depending on who bribes the Supreme Court.

They’re trying to force the big Cs to live at the whims of rural Ohioans despite how close the urban/rural population is