this post was submitted on 17 Jan 2024
942 points (98.7% liked)

Technology

59021 readers
3002 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] designatedhacker@lemm.ee 102 points 9 months ago (3 children)

"Notably, Google, Bing, and DuckDuckGo all have the same problems, and in many cases, Google performed better than Bing and DuckDuckGo by the researchers' measures."

Click bait headline. I see they're good at SEO themselves.

[–] Wogi@lemmy.world 69 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Yeah, DDG skips all the sponsored links but I generally find what I'm looking for faster on Google if I just skip half the page rather than trying to find the right incantation to bring up what I'm looking for on DDG.

[–] 0110010001100010@lemmy.world 34 points 9 months ago (5 children)

I've tried, many times over the years, to use DDG and you are 100% spot-on. I find it damn-near impossible to find what I need without some deep voodoo magic to somehow craft the perfect query. It's been a decade+ since I've gone to page 2 of a Google search. Using DDG I can be 3 or 4 pages deep before maybe finding the answer. There is SOOO much irrelevant stuff to filter through.

It sucks, I don't want to use Google, but there doesn't seem to be a great alternative.

[–] LWD@lemm.ee 22 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (3 children)
[–] brbposting@sh.itjust.works 27 points 9 months ago (3 children)

I swear I’m going to capture screenshots of 2-3 dozen searches across DDG & Google, as well as hopefully Bing, Startpage… SearXNG…

b/c DDG is doodoo while corporate overlord Google is great with Ublock Origin.

Faithfully perform every search on DDG first in the hopes I can keep the data out of Google’s hands! But !g out half the time.

Anybody know of a site, app, or TamperMonkey script that’ll search multiple search engines side-by-side?

In the meantime, one example w/a direct quote from deep inside a Harry Potter book:

[–] LWD@lemm.ee 5 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)
[–] abhibeckert@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

You know DDG is just a wrapper around Bing right? No point comparing the two.

[–] Carighan@lemmy.world 9 points 9 months ago

Not entirely true, they have their own index they use to augment/modify the results with. Like the paper linked in this very post shows, actually.

[–] ratcliff@lemmy.wtf 2 points 9 months ago

Works on SearX

[–] 0110010001100010@lemmy.world 14 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (2 children)

Honestly it's been a yearish since I've tried and my memory is shit so I don't have any specific examples I can give now. In general though the bulk of my searches involve:

  • A local company I need for xyz or a specific type of restaurant
  • Issues/repairs for a specific make/model/year car (I do lots of my own work)
  • Various homelab related things (docker services for xyz)
  • Details about a movie or TV show (sometimes a specific episode)
  • Prices for products and where I can get them (trying to de-Amazon)
  • How to fix xyz in my home

I'm sure there are more, but those are the ones I can think of off the top of my head.

[–] ObviouslyNotBanana@lemmy.world 9 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

Tbh using DDG is more like using old (and I mean old) Google. Googling things used to be a skill people had. You googled things for other people because they had no idea how to get good results. That's exactly how DDG is. It takes rewiring your brain to use it, and I've been using it for a year now.

I do go to Google sometimes. Specifically for opening hours in stores, and when I'm trying to look for products from smaller online stores I do not yet know of, which takes me to page 3-4 of Google but would've taken me far longer on DDG.

The country switch on DDG is a godsend because you can manipulate searches with it and get some really specific results if you know what you're doing. It's the learning curve that makes DDG worse if you just want to find something without having to teach yourself to search. Which is definitely a point to Google, but if you want a very specific result it's better to battle that learning curve.

I should also add that I'm not really anti Google in any way. I just stopped finding what I was looking for about 70% of the time, and instead found products and shit to consume. It's very useful for that stuff, but I never find obscure tech solutions with Google.

[–] RememberTheApollo@lemmy.world 5 points 9 months ago

All true. DDG is my default search engine now. Yeah. I use others often enough, Google, Bing, searXNG…but I find that if I can’t find it relatively easily on DDG it means I’m going to have to sift through a bunch of SEO sites and sponsored links on Google to find it. It won’t be much easier. One of the most frustrating thing about Google is the “fuck you” they’ve given to search modifiers. The “-“ and quotes are pretty much meaningless. For instance one can enter an error code from a program, perfectly quoted, and Google will tell you there aren’t any good search results. BS. They just can’t figure out how to jam ads into what you’re looking for or something. Bing or DDG will return what you need, it might just be on page 2.

Google really has failed as a search engine.

[–] DreadPotato@sopuli.xyz 3 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

I find that DDG is terrible at finding anything regionally specific, probably because I'm not in the US. I always get a shitload of US hits and usually some German hits if I try to specify location...neither are useful to me.

[–] LWD@lemm.ee 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)
[–] tyler@programming.dev 4 points 9 months ago

I mean, kagi is great. I too got frustrated with the shittiness of DDG and others like ecosia. Paying for a search engine sounds crazy but I’m not going back. Google’s results are absolutely terrible compared to kagi so 🤷‍♀️

[–] Aopen@discuss.tchncs.de 0 points 9 months ago

!sp is something like ddg for bing, but it is based on google

[–] aniki@lemm.ee 0 points 9 months ago (2 children)

just use a !g if you don't get what you want the first time on ddg and you'll still get a proxied google search result.

[–] Engywuck@lemm.ee 8 points 9 months ago (1 children)

AFAIK !g on DDG doesn't proxy anything.

[–] ratcliff@lemmy.wtf 1 points 9 months ago

It does on SearXNG

[–] noodlejetski@lemm.ee 4 points 9 months ago

nothing gets proxied, it's just like searching directly on Google.

[–] victorz@lemmy.world 7 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Would you be able to give an example of what you couldn't find with DDG that was simpler to find with the help of Google? Sounds interesting to me, as I use DDG pretty much exclusively.

[–] Wogi@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I don't remember the specific case, most of the things I Google are local businesses. I find for local businesses Google is a top tier resource. Google can tell me how busy a business is right now, or if they're closed because of the weather. I often have to do some digging to find the business' page on DDG, if they have one. If I'm looking for a local contractor, like a water heater or drywall repair guy, the ads aren't even that intrusive, they're literally what I'm looking for. On DDG, I've got to do some clicking to find a contractor and then all the reviews are on Yelp. General contractors will have a list sometimes on DDG, but it's not all that helpful, I've never seen a phone number without clicking once or twice.

[–] LWD@lemm.ee 4 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)
[–] Carighan@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago (1 children)

But on the flipside, if that data were publically owned and anonymized I'd genuinely want that kept. Since the feature is super useful. Same with busses and so on.

[–] LWD@lemm.ee 3 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)
[–] linearchaos@lemmy.world 5 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I honestly think there's something wrong with Google's individual customization. They're leaning in a little too hard on things you're likely to be searching for rather than what you're actually searching for.

DDG gives me better results for random searches on things I'm not usually looking for. When I was looking for Godot exercises yesterday every hit on DuckDuckGo for ages was just exactly what I wanted. When I went over to search Google there was a lot of more varied topics. Now, hands down if I need what time a certain store closes at a certain location Google will give me exactly what I'm looking for. Likewise if I need to know what's near something else Google is absolutely superior to DDG. Google's image search is also far more accurate and useful.

But then I come back and look for a medical condition for my cat that I've never heard of before, You passed by the sponsors and they've got a couple of random pages about it maybe a Reddit article or two that's now blocked, but it quickly devolves to adjacent searches.

But if I go and search for any of my usual suspects, The rankings come back pretty decent.

[–] Zoboomafoo@slrpnk.net 2 points 9 months ago

I've run into that, I recently started playing The Finals (which I recommend), and Google searches have a hard time not changing my searches to American football, even if I put "video game" in the search

[–] Carighan@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

Yeah, the paper shows a startling lead for Google, more than I would have expected.

I try to swap to DDG every so often (usually once a year, giving it about a month), but every time search ends up being frustrating enough so I don't stick around. Nevermind their boneheaded decision of using Apple Maps over something that actually wants to be useful like OpenStreetMap. But what I didn't expect was just how big the difference between the two is when analyzed, damn.