this post was submitted on 14 Jan 2024
976 points (98.4% liked)

Technology

60048 readers
2928 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] XTornado@lemmy.ml 8 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (4 children)

My worry with all this is that they might say fuck it and put DRM for all YouTube videos which would block attempts to download the videos. Not make it impossible as seen with streaming services but not as trivial as now....

[–] Croquette@sh.itjust.works 11 points 11 months ago (2 children)
[–] DoctorRoxxo@lemmy.world 6 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Heck yeah let’s all go to break.com

[–] Croquette@sh.itjust.works 2 points 11 months ago

Didn't know this was still a thing haha. It brings me back

[–] Abnorc@lemm.ee 2 points 11 months ago

I already subscribed to someone on Floatplane. If it gets much worse on YouTube, it might be time to switch fully.

[–] eskimofry@lemmy.world 7 points 11 months ago (1 children)

The day they go 100% paywalled, is the day their dominance ends. They will never do this because, contrary to the corporate dickriders in this thread they rely on bait and switch tactics to draw the crowd in the first place.

[–] XTornado@lemmy.ml 1 points 11 months ago

I didn't say anything about paywalled.

[–] rabiddolphin@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago

Google's plan is to DRM the web

[–] gila@lemm.ee 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Well the good news is Widevine is very expensive, and doesn't work. It's not as simple as right click / save target as, but Widevine decryption is why you can torrent any of the shows/movies on those streaming services.

Everytime someone requests a video on those services, the service pays a fee to Widevine. $0.50 USD per request for the first 30k requests/month. How much you think Google is willing to pay someone for you to watch cat videos for free?

[–] wolo@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Google owns Widevine, they would be paying a fee to themselves

[–] gila@lemm.ee 1 points 11 months ago

You're right. But then it's also their cost incurred. Their decryption keys to revoke on exploited devices, and their engineers to try and come up with a software patch for their hardware-level CDM. It's costly was my point.