this post was submitted on 05 Jan 2024
589 points (98.0% liked)

News

23397 readers
3536 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.

2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.

3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.

4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.

Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.

5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.

6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.

7. No duplicate posts.

If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.

8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.

9. No link shorteners.

The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.

10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
rjc@lemmy.world
Thekingoflorda@lemmy.world
Tenthrow@lemmy.world
JonsJava@lemmy.world
gedaliyah@lemmy.world
little_cow@lemmy.world
jeffw@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
589
New York governor pushes for paid medical leave during pregnancy (apnews.com)
submitted 10 months ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world
111 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Pregnant people in New York would have 40 hours of paid leave to attend prenatal medical appointments under a new proposal by Gov. Kathy Hochul after the state’s legislative session kicked off this week.

The Democrat’s plan to expand the state’s paid family leave policy, which would need to be approved by the state Legislature, aims to expand access to high-quality prenatal care and prevent maternal and infant deaths in New York, an issue that especially affects low-income and minority communities.

The U.S. infant mortality rate, a measure of how many babies die before they reach their first birthday, is worse than other high-income countries, which experts have attributed to poverty, inadequate prenatal care and other possibilities. The U.S. rate rose 3% in 2022 — the largest increase in two decades, according to a 2023 report by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] bigMouthCommie@kolektiva.social 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)

malthusianism is next to eugenics

[–] derf82@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I disagree. You honestly think we can keep growing to eternity?

[–] bigMouthCommie@kolektiva.social 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)

>You honestly think we can keep growing to eternity

I didn't say that

[–] derf82@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago (4 children)

I don’t say you did. Just following your logic. And you agree we cannot grow forever. So when should we stop? You think we can’t stop now without dire consequences. But some future generation has to. So, who gets to face the consequences that you want to avoid for yourself?

[–] bigMouthCommie@kolektiva.social 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)

>some future generation has to

not necessarily

[–] derf82@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Why not?

[–] bigMouthCommie@kolektiva.social 0 points 10 months ago

technological advanced are unpredictable. we could develop something that brings about effectively the end of scarcity.

[–] bigMouthCommie@kolektiva.social 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)

>who gets to face the consequences that you want to avoid for yourself?

you're making assumptions

[–] derf82@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I’m all ears

[–] bigMouthCommie@kolektiva.social 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)

all I want to avoid is eugenics. I don't know what vague"consequences"you're referencing.

[–] derf82@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago (2 children)

I’m not advocating eugenics. Where did I say only certain people should reproduce and others shouldn’t? Who is putting words into people’s mouths now? I’m done with you.

[–] bigMouthCommie@kolektiva.social 0 points 10 months ago

I'm pointing out that malthusianism is next to eugenics.

[–] bigMouthCommie@kolektiva.social -1 points 10 months ago

>I’m done with you.

thank God

[–] bigMouthCommie@kolektiva.social 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)

>You think we can’t stop now without dire consequences

I didn't say that

[–] derf82@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Population decline is now a similar place that climate change was in the 1970’s. We know what’s going on and it’s not too serious yet, but some of us are sounding an alarm. do we have the foresight to address it while it’s easy or are we going to wait until it’s critical/irreversible?

That seems to be what you are saying.

[–] bigMouthCommie@kolektiva.social 0 points 10 months ago

literally putting words in my mouth. what I'm saying is that malthusianism is next to eugenics.

[–] bigMouthCommie@kolektiva.social -1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

>Just following your logic.

wrong

[–] derf82@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Feel free to explain. You say population decline (something which has yet to start) is a major problem that needs reversed, correct? So we need to grow faster? But you admit we can’t grow forever. So when should we stop growing?

[–] bigMouthCommie@kolektiva.social 0 points 10 months ago

>You say population decline (something which has yet to start) is a major problem

I didn't say that at all.

[–] bigMouthCommie@kolektiva.social 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)

>you admit we can’t grow forever.

I never said that.

[–] derf82@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

So which is it. You said the same thing when I asked if we can keep growing forever.

[–] bigMouthCommie@kolektiva.social 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I suspended judgement on both those claims