this post was submitted on 29 Dec 2023
845 points (96.9% liked)

Work Reform

9991 readers
37 users here now

A place to discuss positive changes that can make work more equitable, and to vent about current practices. We are NOT against work; we just want the fruits of our labor to be recognized better.

Our Philosophies:

Our Goals

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Paywall-free link: https://archive.is/eV7A5

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Dave@lemmy.nz 107 points 10 months ago (2 children)

I thought the point was to get people to resign so they didn't have to pay severance?

[–] SuperSpaceFan@lemmy.ca 33 points 10 months ago (1 children)

My company had that same attitude when they announced full RTO. They were then faced with extremely high turnover for a sustained period. They had trouble hiring people to fulfill the constant merry-go-round of job openings and that negatively impacted productivity. So they backed off from full RTO and moved to a hybrid model instead.

[–] Speculater@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Hybrid model is such a stupid fucking compromise. Come in when a scrum or meeting is needed. Leave everyone else the fuck alone if they're hitting targets.

[–] acceptable_pumpkin@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago

It also limits hiring/job pools because you still need to live close enough to come in to the office. May as well be a full office job then. Hybrid is not a compromise to remote.

[–] SuperSpaceFan@lemmy.ca 1 points 10 months ago

I agree. I would prefer full remote.

[–] winterayars@sh.itjust.works 30 points 10 months ago

Maybe enough people resigned.