Programmer Humor

19187 readers

1120 users here now

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

Keep content in english
No advertisements
Posts must be related to programming or programmer topics

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

Feyter@programming.dev

anzo@programming.dev

BurningTurtle@programming.dev

530

no.. just no (lemmy.ca)

submitted 8 months ago by reimufumo@lemmy.ca to c/programmer_humor@programming.dev

62 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] cmdrkeen@programming.dev 78 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Honestly not the worst thing I’ve seen.

[–] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 13 points 8 months ago (2 children)

I'd like you to think for a moment about CTEs, the HAVING clause, window functions and every other funky and useful thing you can do in SQL ... Now just think, do you think that this syntax supports all those correctly?

[–] cmdrkeen@programming.dev 14 points 8 months ago

Probably no better or worse than any other ORM written in a more traditional language. Worst comes to worst, you can always escape to plain SQL.