this post was submitted on 27 Dec 2023
370 points (96.2% liked)

Mildly Interesting

17580 readers
6 users here now

This is for strictly mildly interesting material. If it's too interesting, it doesn't belong. If it's not interesting, it doesn't belong.

This is obviously an objective criteria, so the mods are always right. Or maybe mildly right? Ahh.. what do we know?

Just post some stuff and don't spam.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] raconteur_rob@lemy.lol 207 points 1 year ago (3 children)

It's an optical illusion. The planes aren't really that close together. The person who shot the video is using a telephoto lens and is zoomed way in. This compresses the space and flattens it out so it's hard to judge distance. Also the plane in front is smaller than the one in the back which heightens the illusion. It's a really cool shot!

[–] alvvayson@lemmy.world 51 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Comparing the engine sizes or counting the windows really shows that the back plane is probably double the size of the front plane.

Cool illusion.

[–] Jayayess1190@lemmy.world 26 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The one in back is a larger 737, the other is a smaller Embraer.

[–] get_off_the_phone@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This is what I came here for. Thank you.

[–] intensely_human@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago

And this is what I came here for. So thank you too

[–] XeroxCool@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Definitely the windows, but recent planes have gone with huge turbines so it's not the most reliable tell. I don't know Airbus well but the turbines on a 737-800 or Mac are pretty big compared to a - 300 or A320

[–] betterdeadthanreddit@lemmy.world 35 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Wait a minute, are you telling me that the hobbit actors weren't really that small?

No they were, Peter Jackson just had his actor's legs cut off for the movie

[–] jol@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I mean, it's rare enough that 2 planes land at the same time. They are definitely "close" but probably some 200m apart.

[–] Wxfisch@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It’s not as rare as you may think. I used to work at a weather service office located right near the end of one of the runways at IAD and it would happen a few times a day if the airport was busy and the winds were such that they were coming in from our side.

[–] jol@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 year ago

Interesting. Thank you for correcting me. TIL