this post was submitted on 22 Dec 2023
946 points (98.1% liked)

politics

19072 readers
4100 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Yearly1845@reddthat.com 12 points 10 months ago (2 children)

There the Democrats go again not doing anything!

[–] blazeknave@lemmy.world 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)

The demographic is changed on Lemmy. You need /s now.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Not everyone accepts half measures as complete solutions.

[–] blazeknave@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Not everyone who appreciates progress is accepting anything as a complete solution. I fit your criteria. You don't fit mine. My opinion is you have a detrimental attitude and equivocating any minor win to total loss diminishes the value of a win and kills morale and momentum for more wins.

Inertia. Winning begets winning and losing begets losing.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world -1 points 10 months ago (2 children)

equivocating any minor win to total loss diminishes the value of a win

Treating minor steps as major wins leads me to consider minor wins as token gestures designed to placate with as little change as possible. Followup will only follow if continued pressure is applied.

If enough people are satisfied, the party has no reason to continue trying.

[–] blazeknave@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Per my other comment, I never called it a total win. But fwiw, if I'm going to defend the win here, not just my disappointment with sentiment in general on here.. this isn't minor. I'd call it major. Do you have any idea how many lives have been ruined by policies that are being rolled back? While you're intellectualizing the other victims of the states whose rights continue to be infringed upon, have you considered the experience of a single person that will get out? Or their families?

Have you had first hand experience with the legal system? For weed? Have you been locked up? Have you spent a day without the right to decide when you want a glass of water or breath of fresh air.

These are people. Not statistics. Not liberal arts theses.

You're not seeing the forest for the trees.

And my editorial and feelings about that, and this forum: that is cold and uncaring. This post was about human beings being liberated from unfair persecution. People instead are choosing to use it as a soapbox to regurgitate to the choir that there are also other problems. No shit Sherlock. That's why we're all on here, a common set of those beliefs. That has nothing to do with whether we celebrate the freedom of our incarcerated brothers and sisters. So yeah, this place is starting to suck. And if you can't see where I'm coming from and acknowledge it without being defensive or doubling down and shouting through me, you're part of the problem and never going to see it.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 0 points 10 months ago

I’d call it major

That's no surprise.

Do you have any idea how many lives have been ruined by policies that are being rolled back?

No policy is being rolled back here. All this does is pardon a fraction of existing simple possession convictions. The policies are still in place and are still enforceable. New convictions will happen.

Have you had first hand experience with the legal system? For weed? Have you been locked up? Have you spent a day without the right to decide when you want a glass of water or breath of fresh air.

Not for weed, but yes.

These are people. Not statistics. Not liberal arts theses.

And as long as the racist war on drugs carries on, there will be more casualties, each one an unconscionable tragedy. I want that to stop forever, everywhere. I know that letting up pressure will delay that, at best, and that every delay is more casualties. More lives ruined, more families destroyed, more communities disrupted.

The batter bunted and is strolling triumphantly towards first, waving his cap at the crowd. Run, damn you.

[–] TheSanSabaSongbird@lemdro.id 0 points 10 months ago

More than one thing can be true at once.

[–] chitak166@lemmy.world -1 points 10 months ago

Why did they wait until an upcoming election to do it?