this post was submitted on 15 Dec 2023
161 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37717 readers
364 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:

This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
alyaza@beehaw.org
TheRtRevKaiser@beehaw.org
gyrfalcon@beehaw.org
rs5th@beehaw.org
coldredlight@beehaw.org
Los@beehaw.org
SemioticStandard@beehaw.org
TheRtRevKaiser@kbin.social
remington@beehaw.org
161
Most readers want publishers to label AI-generated articles — but trust outlets less when they do (www.niemanlab.org)
submitted 11 months ago by alyaza@beehaw.org to c/technology@beehaw.org
29 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] souperk@reddthat.com 65 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (2 children)

The title is pretty self explanatory. Yes, I want to know if it's AI generated because I don't trust it.

I agree with the conclusion that it's important to disclose how the AI was used. AI can be great to reduce the time needed for boilerplate work, so the authors can focus on what's important like reviewing and verifying the accuracy of the information.

[–] otter@lemmy.ca 32 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Yep, my trust would go:

  1. Site that states they don't use AI to generate articles
  2. Site that labels when they use AI generated articles
  3. Sites that don't say anything and write in a weird way

 

  1. Sites that get caught using AI without disclosing it.

So ideally don't use AI, but if you do make it clear when and how. If a site gets CAUGHT using AI, then I'm probably going to avoid it altogether

[–] jarfil@beehaw.org 3 points 11 months ago

reduce the time needed for boilerplate work

Or... and this is just an idea... don't add "boilerplate" to articles.

If the content of an article can be summarized in a single table, I don't want to read 10 paragraphs explaining the contents of the table row by row. The main reason to do that, is to pad the article and let the publisher put more ad sections between paragraph and paragraph, while making it harder to find the data I'm interested in.

Still, I foresee a future where humans will fill out the table, shove it at an AI to do the "boilerplate work", and then... users showing the whole article into an AI to strip the boilerplate and summarize it.

A great scenario for AI vendors, not so great for anyone else.