this post was submitted on 09 Dec 2023
601 points (99.0% liked)

Programmer Humor

32453 readers
261 users here now

Post funny things about programming here! (Or just rant about your favourite programming language.)

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] HiddenLayer5@lemmy.ml 18 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (3 children)

If all the corporations can just stop trying to be cute in their error messages, that would be great. This is literally worse than "ERROR: Unknown Error" because this goes out of its way to taunt you while still giving you no actionable information.

[–] pomodoro_longbreak@sh.itjust.works 7 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

I will say that at least it has an error code. So you can actually look it up

[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 6 points 11 months ago

I see nothing wrong with it

How can the client know the back end issue

And

What’s the point of giving it to the end user

Any fix would be the user contacting the company and the error code is there. Follow ups would be a traceroute

[–] MrScottyTay@sh.itjust.works 4 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Depends if this cure message is a psuedonym for the real message. Kind of you have a different quip for each one, then reporting it the Devs will know what the issue is but any bad actors won't be able to try and discern cause and effect from any exploits they are trying (or at least make it harder)

[–] 0laura@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

security through obscurity is not security.

[–] MrScottyTay@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 month ago

Didn't say it was the best practice, but it is a practice