this post was submitted on 04 Dec 2023
339 points (98.0% liked)

politics

19082 readers
4064 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Telorand@reddthat.com 136 points 10 months ago (3 children)

Behold Fox News trying to win back some of their moderate viewers and cover their assess, so they don't get hit with another billion dollar lawsuit.

[–] Son_of_dad@lemmy.world 92 points 10 months ago (2 children)

If anyone is undecided on Trump at this point, they're not moderates.

[–] Alivrah@lemmy.world 49 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Just because the dude wants to rule as God on earth doesn't mean you can't have a nuanced, neutral view on him! /s

[–] CleoTheWizard@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

Yeah I mean I’m fine with trump locking up his political opponents for no reason, I just don’t want to hear him talk about it on tv. I also really don’t understand democratic voters that care more about democracy than gas prices or inflation. Were you people not paying attention when he cut our nursing home population in half?

[–] Kushan@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I don't think /u/Telorand was suggesting that. Rather I think they're saying that Fox news is trying to appeal to both trump supporters and non-trump supporters within their base, whatever their base counts as these days.

[–] eltrain123@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago

My pops is super conservative and he finally came around to thinking trump is a grifter and criminal. Fox went a long way (or all the way and then some) towards discrediting themselves within the journalism community, but they still have a lot of boomers that are addicted to the outrage they spew.

I don’t think they are trying to appeal to their audience that is closer to center. I think they realize they can’t support open fascism and come out the other side if it fails.

[–] mosiacmango@lemm.ee 28 points 10 months ago (1 children)

They still have another ongoing billion dollar lawsuit from smartmatic, the other voting machine company they slandered.

[–] Telorand@reddthat.com 11 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, isn't it great? Their comeuppance is long overdue.

[–] Thirdborne@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Don't kid yourself. Smartmatic is in it for a payday. They're not interested in justice or even revenge. Might make Fox temporarily uncomfortable, but there won't be any pressure for journalistic reform and if they have to stop short of bankrupting them to ensure maximum payout, that's what they'll do.

[–] Telorand@reddthat.com 5 points 10 months ago

Smartmatic is in it for a payday. They're not interested in justice or even revenge.

Sure. But that doesn't mean I can't enjoy it vicariously. I'm not expecting Fox to get bankrupted. But they rolled the dice on some real whoppers, and since money is their lifeblood, I'm happy to see them really bleed for it for once.

[–] deft@ttrpg.network 7 points 10 months ago

it is because less people are watching.

a, news is different most don't watch cable

b, pearl clutching becomes tiresome