this post was submitted on 28 Nov 2023
2046 points (96.8% liked)

Political Memes

5494 readers
1860 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Mamertine@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I don't think you comprehend the vastness and remoteness of the American West.

There are places where the law enforcement response time is over an hour simply because it takes that long for the one deputy working the county to drive from one side of the country to the other. There's no point in having more deputies working a county where there are only 2 people living per square mile. Nor is there the finances to hire additional police protection.

Most of the USA that is not the case, but it is a reality for some places in the lower 48 states. Alaska is that to another level.

Police funding is a function of city or county, and sometimes state population. Metro area have the funding. Rural places just can't afford to employ enough police to reduce response time to under 30 minutes.

[–] theKalash@feddit.ch 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yes, I alluded to that in the previous comment. But is that really a good argument for everyone to have a firearm? You can make exceptions for specific places. Like, all firearms have to be registered and licenced but in rural areas you can get the required training for free.

[–] Mamertine@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

The ultimate issue is the American constitution says Americans get to own guns. In order to change that requires 2/3rds of the states to want to change that.

As in California with their 39.5 million citizens has the same power to change it as Alaska with their 600,000 citizens.

The supreme Court of the USA has said the constitutional rights are fairly broad for gun ownership. In theory that's mostly settled case law so that won't change short of a miracle.

We can debate if it's prudent or not, but it's unlikely to change here.

Fwiw, I'm in favor of some reasonable reforms. There's just no point in pursuing them since it's in the constitution here.

[–] BorgDrone@lemmy.one 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

There's no point in having more deputies working a county where there are only 2 people living per square mile.

How much crime is there in areas with 2 people per 5.17998 square kilometers that you need an AR-15 for self defense? Does the US have bands of roving marauders? Are we talking a Mad Max like scenario?

If you happen to live in such a place, how many gun fights do you get into in an average week?

[–] Mamertine@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

I don't recall mentioning AR-15s in my response.

Does the US have bands of roving marauders?

Not that I'm aware of.

Are we talking a Mad Max like scenario?

Nope, anyways that is set in Australia.