Asklemmy

43826 readers

869 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

Open-ended question
Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

Lemmyverse: community search
sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
!lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

927

Why is everything in consumer / American life so fucking shitty now - and companies literally just say 'oh bc profit margins' and we're now expected to swallow that and sympathize? (lemmy.world)

submitted 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) by _number8_@lemmy.world to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml

287 comments fedilink hide all child comments

like I went to taco bell and they didn't even have napkins out. they had the other stuff just no napkins, I assume because some fucking ghoul noticed people liked taking them for their cars so now we just don't get napkins! so they can save $100 per quarter rather than provide the barest minimum quality of life features.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Vcio@lemmy.world 51 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (3 children)

As was once said(something like): if vote with your wallet, the people with bigger wallets get more votes.

[–] SkyNTP@lemmy.ml 16 points 11 months ago

Capitalism: a short story.

[–] therealjcdenton@lemmy.zip 1 points 11 months ago

Yep that's true, but I think in the long haul appealing to more people is better than just one

[–] AnonStoleMyPants@sopuli.xyz 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Sounds like a weird saying.

It assumes that the people with bigger wallets also use a larger portion (absolute money, not percentages) on the "thing" to begin with. If the billionaire and the middle class man uses 10€ on the same thing a month, and both stop doing it, then they both got the same amount of "votes". Much more fitting would be: "if you vote with your wallet, people who spend more money get more votes".

Of course this only applies if you're talking about boycots etc, and not about buying stuff.

And yes, people with bigger wallets probably have more sway and power when it comes to get getting their way if they want to, but when people talk about voting with your wallet, they're not talking about this.

[–] Vcio@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

“if you vote with your wallet, people who spend more money get more votes”.

as i said "something like", but overall it's the same idea, semantics.

Of course this only applies if you’re talking about boycots etc, and not about buying stuff.

It applies in both cases, for example the design of a product (game Diablo 4) or the process of gentrification.