this post was submitted on 25 Nov 2023
715 points (96.6% liked)

politics

19145 readers
2552 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Texas State Rep. James Talarico using biblical scripture to tear down conservative Christian arguments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] fakeman_pretendname@feddit.uk 29 points 1 year ago (3 children)

They're fine with the Old Testament, it's got plenty of treachery, rape, slavery and fraud cheered on by God, mixed in with smiting and destroying things that disagree with you.

They have a problem with the teachings of Christ in the New Testament, which is all a bit too "someone was different to me so I made friends with them and we ate together".

[–] darth_tiktaalik@lemmy.ml 11 points 1 year ago

rape, slavery

It draws an odd moral line here where a virgin prisoner of war can basically be raped for the rest of her life as a "wife" but the act of doing so makes it so the "husband" cannot sell her into slavery after leaving her.

I think the best way of summing up biblical ethics is "there's animal rights but women are the animals"

[–] cosmicrookie@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I thought that was the main difference between Christians and Jews though

[–] APassenger@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Jewish tradition celebrates reason and doesn't have the hell Christians do (or so I'm told).

[–] IHadTwoCows@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] treefrog@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The sarcastic air quotes reveal your bias towards organized religion as a whole as well as your ignorance of Jewish culture.

Science and education are a fundamental part of Jewish culture. Someone regarded as one of the smartest people in recent history is Jewish and I imagine that without his parents valuing education and science, the rest of us would still think time and space are two separate things.

Yes, there are orthodox and dogmatic Jews just like in any religion. But just because someone has a much different world view than you doesn't mean they don't value reason.

[–] IHadTwoCows@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago

Yes, I absolutely fucking despise organized religion in all it's forms. Got NO problem saying that. All organized religions are evil by definition.

[–] Cranakis@lemmy.one 1 points 1 year ago

doesn’t mean they don’t value reason.

.... they believe in 3000 year old fairy tales. They don't value reason any more than any other religion. Reason gets in the way.

[–] MossyFeathers@pawb.social 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The new testament and old testament "god" are so different that sometimes I wonder if the new testament is 5% Jesus^1 hijacking an old religion to try and make something good out of it, and 95% his followers trying to make sense and reconcile what Jesus taught with the old testament.


^1 afaik it's fairly well established that Jesus - or someone like him - existed, the big question is if they were actually a deity or not.

[–] fakeman_pretendname@feddit.uk 1 points 1 year ago

I think there's definitely something in your line of thinking. In modern terms, there's a lot retconning in the New Testament to make the books add up as a series. They spend the whole "intro" persuading you it follows a direct lineage over ~2000 years.

There's some pretty wild "fan theories". Some say it's correcting the "errors", "corruption of language over time" or "devil influence" of the older book, others say OT "YHWH" is not NT "God almighty", but an unrelated angry local God.

They all claim "Newest is truest" - even the more controversial "later sequels".