this post was submitted on 18 Nov 2023
1 points (100.0% liked)

Football / Soccer / Calcio / Futebol / Fußball

142 readers
1 users here now

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] chaves4life@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago (15 children)

Considering Portugal were shit until 96, it's quite a good result

[–] ContaSoParaIsto@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago (9 children)

People on this sub would have you believe that we only became good because of Ronaldo

[–] effervescentrist@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago (5 children)

I mean... 26/39 games here had Ronaldo in the squad. Portugal did well in the 84 and 00 euros though.

[–] Ohmygosh0@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

3/17 WC qualification prior to ronaldo and 5/5 with Ronaldo.

[–] ly_jacksonmartinez@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago

I think it's more due to the fact of improving academies and getting football / coaching / tactical periodization taught in college concluding in a general evolution of portuguese football instead of just relying on mid foreign players just because it's cheaper.

Also developing coaches such as José Mourinho, Jorge Jesus, André Villas-Boas, Bruno Lage, Luís Castro, Vítor Pereira, Abel Ferreira, Marco Silva, Sérgio Conceição, Jesualdo Ferreira, Carlos Carvalhal or Leonardo Jardim which consequently led to developing players such as Costinha, Maniche, Tiago, Pepe, Ricardo Carvalho, Moutinho, Meireles, Bosingwa, Nani, Quaresma, Coentrão, Danilo, William, Nelson Semedo, Ruben Dias, Joao Cancelo, Bernardo Silva, Diogo Dalot, Nuno Mendes, Bruno Fernandes, João Palhinha, Ruben Neves, João Félix, Vitinha, Matheus Nunes, Rafael Leão, etc etc etc

I wonder if this had something to do with Portugal's recent success. But I don't think so, it probably was because of Ronaldo, sure.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)