this post was submitted on 18 Nov 2023
1 points (100.0% liked)

Main

139 readers
1 users here now

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] effervescentrist@alien.top 1 points 10 months ago (4 children)

I mean... 26/39 games here had Ronaldo in the squad. Portugal did well in the 84 and 00 euros though.

[–] ContaSoParaIsto@alien.top 1 points 10 months ago

I mean... 26/39 games here had Ronaldo in the squad.

Do I really need to point out the problem with this logic? I genuinely mean that

[–] TheRealPasanac@alien.top 1 points 10 months ago

2004 euro they were in the finals with the Greece

[–] acecant@alien.top 1 points 10 months ago

In ‘04 CR7 was a secondary player. Portugal would be one of the favorites with or without him especially considering it was a home turf

[–] Ohmygosh0@alien.top 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

3/17 WC qualification prior to ronaldo and 5/5 with Ronaldo.

[–] ly_jacksonmartinez@alien.top 1 points 10 months ago

I think it's more due to the fact of improving academies and getting football / coaching / tactical periodization taught in college concluding in a general evolution of portuguese football instead of just relying on mid foreign players just because it's cheaper.

Also developing coaches such as José Mourinho, Jorge Jesus, André Villas-Boas, Bruno Lage, Luís Castro, Vítor Pereira, Abel Ferreira, Marco Silva, Sérgio Conceição, Jesualdo Ferreira, Carlos Carvalhal or Leonardo Jardim which consequently led to developing players such as Costinha, Maniche, Tiago, Pepe, Ricardo Carvalho, Moutinho, Meireles, Bosingwa, Nani, Quaresma, Coentrão, Danilo, William, Nelson Semedo, Ruben Dias, Joao Cancelo, Bernardo Silva, Diogo Dalot, Nuno Mendes, Bruno Fernandes, João Palhinha, Ruben Neves, João Félix, Vitinha, Matheus Nunes, Rafael Leão, etc etc etc

I wonder if this had something to do with Portugal's recent success. But I don't think so, it probably was because of Ronaldo, sure.