this post was submitted on 11 Nov 2023
98 points (99.0% liked)

Asklemmy

43919 readers
1625 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy ๐Ÿ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] hai@lemmy.ml 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's Florida how do you expect to be able to force them to do anything?

[โ€“] otter@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I'm dumb, thought it was about stealing something from the past to the present. So these answers do fit the prompt


My first reaction was "bring a T-Rex to the year 2000 and threaten them with it". Ended up pestering AI till it agreed to answer a similar question, here's a summary of those answers:

Advanced Surveillance Technology: Bringing back highly advanced surveillance technology from a more technologically developed era could be a game-changer.

This one makes some sense. You go back to 1999 (or future if possible) and bring equipment that can detect and prove the fact beyond reasonable doubt. Enough to cause the count.

Influential Evidence from the Future: Bringing back concrete evidence from the future, such as detailed records of the government's planned election fraud, could be used to expose and prevent these actions. This could include documents, videos, or other irrefutable proof of planned malpractices in the election.

Now this one goes against the prompt somewhat, but it would be the most effective. Although the butterfly effects from proving time travel may cause new issues...

[โ€“] ninjan@lemmy.mildgrim.com 3 points 1 year ago

You could be extremely careful to only take with you evidence that would be fresh but not before the fact. Explaining how you got them will be the tricky part either way