this post was submitted on 09 Nov 2023
279 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37717 readers
413 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] echodot@feddit.uk 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

They claim that the die that they use for the M1 chip doesn't support USB 3 standards but the die that they use for the M1 Pro chip does.

Which is probably true, but they also made the chip so it's not much of a defence.

[–] abhibeckert@beehaw.org 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

they also made the chip so it’s not much of a defence

It's a pretty old chip though. They shipped it over a year ago and even that was mostly just an upgrade from LPDDR4 to LPDDR5. Which is a substantial upgrade, real world performance wise, but most of the engineering work would've been done by whoever makes the memory - not Apple's own chip design team who presumably were working on something else (I'd guess desktop/laptop chips, and those certainly do have USB-3).

Apple certainly could have included USB-3 support in those chips... but three years ago there wasn't any pressing reason to that so and this year they've added support for the models with the most expensive camera. And anyone who cares about data transfer speeds will buy the one with the best camera.