this post was submitted on 08 Nov 2023
54 points (98.2% liked)

Canada

10137 readers
797 users here now

What's going on Canada?

Related Communities

🍁 Meta

🗺️ Provinces / Territories

🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.

🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer

💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.

💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales

🗣️ Politics

🍁 Social / Culture

Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

  2. Misinformation is not welcome here.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
otter@lemmy.ca
mp3@lemmy.ca
otter@piefed.ca
mp3@piefed.ca
54
People love living in co-ops — so why did Canada kill the program? | Ricochet (ricochet.media)
submitted 2 years ago by grte@lemmy.ca to c/canada@lemmy.ca
8 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] rab@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Those percentages are pretty low. What does "involvement" mean?

[–] girlfreddy@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

The source I included above says this:

We have gone through these disclosures and identified which political representatives, and/or their spouses/common-law partners/dependents, fit into one or more of the following categories: 1) disclose residential rental property that they earn an income from; 2) disclose residential rental property without disclosing any income; 3) disclose non-residential property (vacant lots, farmland, etc.); 4) disclose some sort of other involvement in real estate (for example as a real estate agent, or with investments in real estate investment trusts).

So 128 MPs have some sort of involvement in real estate.