this post was submitted on 26 Oct 2023
126 points (83.9% liked)

politics

19089 readers
3848 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] PeepinGoodArgs@reddthat.com 6 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I don't. I'm not sure who had actually read the article...

[–] mosiacmango@lemm.ee 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Ehh, the article is good, but people get the theme it's going for already.

Blaming the person who is reasonable for not covering for the unreasonable person does not make the reasonable person responsible when shit blows up.

The GOP is playing at "if you just gave me what i wanted, I would stop hitting them" and trying to say that it's the "not hitting peoples" fault for not giving in.

Folk aint buying it.

[–] ryathal@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Did you expect pro republican comments?

[–] charonn0@startrek.website 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

That's not really what they're saying. Instead, they're saying that it's obvious which commenters only read the headline.

[–] moody@lemmings.world 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Which is due to the headline being phrased in the same way as the commonly used Reddit theme of AITA. It makes it seem as if the OP is asking the question, rather than it being the headline of an editorial.

[–] charonn0@startrek.website 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Or people are just lazy and self-righteous.

[–] moody@lemmings.world 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

A little from column A, a little from column B

[–] MilkToastGhost@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The concept behind am I the asshole is that even though a title can lead people in one direction the explainition may take you in another. All the people who didn't read the article and instead made snap judges based off a title.. YTA

[–] RunningInRVA@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I read the last 10% because the first 90% was explaining how the AITA subreddit works. Worthless article IMO.

Also, Democrats NTA. McCarthy was a goon and everybody knew it. That picture of him shaking Cheeto’s hand in the days following 1/6 was all anybody needed to see to know this.

[–] PeepinGoodArgs@reddthat.com 2 points 1 year ago

Worthless article IMO.

Oof! At least you read the article. Thx.