this post was submitted on 25 Oct 2023
576 points (98.6% liked)

politics

19107 readers
3035 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] alienanimals@lemmy.world 88 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Fines need to scale with the net worth of the person, otherwise they only impact poor people.

[–] 0x0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 29 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That wouldn't be very effective. Trump's net worth is a function of his mood.

[–] JonEFive@midwest.social 12 points 1 year ago

And the capabilities of whoever he has cooking the books for that particular transaction.

[–] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 18 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Well, if it doubles every time, it shouldn't take too long to reach the point where he can't pay...

[–] ShaggySnacks@lemmy.myserv.one 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Fines Doubled

  • $5k
  • $10k
  • $20k
  • $40k
  • $80k
  • $160k
  • $320k
  • $640k
  • $1,208m
  • $2,560m
  • $5,120m
  • $10,240m
  • $20,480m
  • $40,960m
  • $81,920m
  • $163,840m
  • $327,680m
  • $655,360m
  • $1,310,750b

It would take Trump 19 times violating the gag order before hitting a billion dollars. Even if you add up the fines cumulatively, it would take 18 times before Trump had to pay over a billion dollars. A poor person would be crippled by the first fine.

Edit: Counting is hard.

[–] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You still believe the guy is a billionaire?

[–] ShaggySnacks@lemmy.myserv.one 2 points 1 year ago

Would I be shocked that Trump had a billion dollars stashed away in various off shore bank accounts. No.

Would I be shocked that Trump didn't have two pennies to rub and was doing all this grifting to stay afloat. No.

Trump lies so much about his wealth. I would wager that Trump is only a multi-millionaire at best. Again, Trump grift game is pretty good and doesn't seem to pay his debts.

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Yeah it would. He'd have to violate it 10 times for the doubling to even pass one hundredth of a billion.

Sounds like you're severely underestimating the vast gulf between 10,000 and however many billions his creditors are allowing him to have.

[–] MedicPigBabySaver@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

He's not remotely a billionaire. His whole life is a lie. Everything he's connected with is over valued and he has a ton of debt. He's a flim flam man, not a billionaire.

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

He's a fraud with a negative net worth but due to said fraud and his organised crime and rogue nations connections, billions are still made available for him

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

I agree completely. Problem is that it's not an oversight, it's by design. They made it like this and keep it like this on purpose.

[–] MedicPigBabySaver@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

He's worthless. His asset value is a lie and he has tremendous debt.

He should be in jail.