this post was submitted on 02 Aug 2023
197 points (99.0% liked)
Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.
5219 readers
542 users here now
Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.
As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades:
How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world:
Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:
Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
How do you politically influence non-western-friendly regimes/countries? That's more than 2/3 of all the polution/emissions.
Good points, thanks
Not much that can be done there, but it's like a wildfire. Throwing more fire at it doesn't help any.
This seems hopeless. Most people are hard right-wing, think global warming is a hoax, and will instantly classify anyone who claims otherwise as a liar.
There are some very loud people like that, but polling shows they're a minority.
That's news to me. Last I heard, polling showed Trump leading Biden by a significant margin.
There are occasionally polls like that, but the popular vote is close. The way electoral votes are tallied, Biden needs to be more than +3 to win the election.
People's opinion on individual issues and on candidates are pretty disconnected. For candidates, unfortunately, it feels like some people picking a sports team and rooting for them no matter what. There's also the bias they get from rooting for a team that they distrust those who don't root for the same team.
But generally most people do agree a lot more than it may seem. For example, if you ask questions about the individual policies for "Obamacare", Republicans are in favor of almost everything... Except they originally thought it needed a public option so it's not just handouts for corporations. Why do you think right wing media hammered on that issue for long and hard? They were trying to train their followers.
How to get beyond this blind team worship is beyond me. But I've noticed the same disconnect with my mom, whom repeats talking goings from the likes of Limbaugh (when he was alive), but her takes are pro-universal health care... She just frames in talking points from right wing pundits somehow. Granted, she's a bit alienated by the Republican party because of LGB issues (T left off intentionally... She tries not to be transphobic, but she's not great at it), so she generally won't vote for them. If it weren't for social wedge issues, she'd be voting for them. I think there's some room to work with people if they already trust you personally though.