this post was submitted on 02 Aug 2023
197 points (99.0% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

5062 readers
340 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world.  About 1C of total warming.  Second chart:  about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability.  Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases.  About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] WalrusDragonOnABike@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

People's opinion on individual issues and on candidates are pretty disconnected. For candidates, unfortunately, it feels like some people picking a sports team and rooting for them no matter what. There's also the bias they get from rooting for a team that they distrust those who don't root for the same team.

But generally most people do agree a lot more than it may seem. For example, if you ask questions about the individual policies for "Obamacare", Republicans are in favor of almost everything... Except they originally thought it needed a public option so it's not just handouts for corporations. Why do you think right wing media hammered on that issue for long and hard? They were trying to train their followers.

How to get beyond this blind team worship is beyond me. But I've noticed the same disconnect with my mom, whom repeats talking goings from the likes of Limbaugh (when he was alive), but her takes are pro-universal health care... She just frames in talking points from right wing pundits somehow. Granted, she's a bit alienated by the Republican party because of LGB issues (T left off intentionally... She tries not to be transphobic, but she's not great at it), so she generally won't vote for them. If it weren't for social wedge issues, she'd be voting for them. I think there's some room to work with people if they already trust you personally though.