this post was submitted on 23 Oct 2023
895 points (97.6% liked)

politics

19121 readers
3038 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] orrk@lemmy.world 49 points 1 year ago (2 children)

you need to get out of your media bubble, but hey the most pro-worker/pro-Union president in American history "can barely read from (a) teleprompter" vs. the attempt to overthrow the nation is funny guy

[–] BigBlackCockroach@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

The irony of a horse complaining about having of two possible riders, the one that is weaker, is clearly lost on a lot of people. If Biden was as weak as you said, wouldn't that be a good thing for @buzz as Biden would also be less capeable of opressing @buzz? If the (according to him) more virile Trump was elected, he would have a more virile guy with his boot on his neck.

[–] orrk@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago

ya, but the other one is funny when he enacts his dictatorship

[–] rchive@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Most people don't want less oppression, they just want someone who will oppress the people they don't like instead of them. In fact, I think given the choices A) I get oppressed 2x but people I don't like get oppressed 3x where x is my current oppression, and B) everyone gets oppressed less, most people would choose A.

[–] BigBlackCockroach@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

That's playing to lose, we people got to be rational and play to win. Just pursue our common interests. Everybody is advocating for themselves but regular people.

[–] Mrderisant@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago

It's not even that he can't read. How much of that is his speech impediment?