My country used to have communism. Niche shops like this barely ever started as small businesses and instead usually started out as specialized departments of large all-encompassing state corporations. Instead of there being a company that specialized in making furniture, the furniture would be made by the logging company. The company that ran a chemical plant would directly sell shampoos, paints, toothpaste, fertillizer, etc. It cut out middle men but the products were usually crap quality because it couldn't focus on each product individually. This stifled progress. My dad wanted to learn programming (this was the late 80s) but because the government was too oldschool to open a computer science degree programme, the only way to get near a computer was to go to a university that specialized in mining and take a programme in mining machine automation.

[–] azertyfun@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

On the flipside, it's not illegal anywhere in capitalismland™ for the workers to own the means of production. It's called a cooperative. Get a bunch of your comrades together, sign a few legal documents, pool your money for a downpayment, get a loan. Badabing, badaboom, "communist" unicycle repair shop.

(The bank might however disagree with you that a unicycle repair shop is a viable business venture in most cities, but hey in my book that still beats a Central Planning Bureau telling you "Nyet, no-one needs unicycles, however we need you at the mines, glory to Arstotzka!").

[–] SubArcticTundra@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Agreed. Actually a capitalism with cooperatives is the flavor of capitalism that I support.

[–] BirdyBoogleBop@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 year ago

I believe you should look up market socialism if that interests you.

[–] bouh@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

It works until a guy with too much money decides it must stops. That's the problem with capitalism: it basically recreates feudalism.

The biggest question is who gets the power. A dictatorial state or an oligarchy of capitalists is the same.

Liberalism won against USSR because they restrained themselves just long enough for USSR to collapse.

[–] masquenox@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

On the flipside, it’s not illegal anywhere in capitalismland™

It's also not illegal in capitalismland™ to use economic chicanery to outcompete and either destroy or swallow any productive organization that doesn't sacrifice everything to the profit principle - which might explain why there is no need for it to make co-ops illegal.

[–] bouh@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Bad management is not the the specialty of communism. In fact, this is a governance problem: is it lead by an idiot and how can people change the lead to solve this problem. Capitalism has this problem currently with governments and companies directions totally unable to do anything about climate change and wealth inequalities.

People always mistaken dictature or oligarchy with communism unfortunately.