this post was submitted on 18 Oct 2023
112 points (95.9% liked)

politics

19089 readers
3900 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Republican lawmakers are proposing blocking kids from accessing social media in schools that receive federal broadband subsidies.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] foggy@lemmy.world 29 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Y'all know about 5G, right?

We already block social media at a lot of schools. Doesn't do shit when all you need to do is disconnect from the schools wifi to see what you want...

[–] YIj54yALOJxEsY20eU@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

In before they address this and propose tracking each student's phone to see if they are in a school zone (and of course to see much more).

[–] foggy@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

School would have to provide the phones, not even close to within our budget

Plus plenty of students just wouldnt accept them an if forced to take them would just toss em into a drawer and forget about them.

[–] YIj54yALOJxEsY20eU@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Not unless we had a large cohort of people doing everything in their power to undermine our freedom and privacy.

[–] foggy@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

No, that's how public education works.

You can't require people have things, you have to provide them. Thats how that works.

[–] YIj54yALOJxEsY20eU@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago

We are discussing law makers just so you know, not saying it will happen but that some would love it it.

[–] Nightwingdragon@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That would be impossible to do without impacting the ability of neighboring homes to access the internet as well. It's not like the signals magically stop at the school parking lot.

[–] YIj54yALOJxEsY20eU@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

Exactly what I'm getting at

[–] YoBuckStopsHere@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Kids are suspended if caught with a cellphone on school property in our district.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

I'm sure glad that isn't true in mine. My daughter called me today to tell me she was really sick and the nurse wasn't going to send her home. I knew my wife has been really sick and so I knew she needed to go to the doctor. I wouldn't have even heard about it until after she got home from school if she didn't have a phone.

[–] foggy@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Easy enough to setup a wifi hotspot in the bathroom and keep it in your pocket.

[–] Nightwingdragon@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This varies greatly from district to district. I know of plenty of schools that do the same. But I also know school districts (and luckily live in one) where this would never fly. They tried doing this during my daughter's sophomore year of high school, and the parents all said "Oh, fucking no. If I want to be able to get in touch with my kid, I'll make that decision, not you."

I also know of districts that tried this and just abandoned the idea because it was nigh-on impossible to enforce without suspending like 90% of the kids.

[–] YoBuckStopsHere@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I also know of districts that tried this and just abandoned the idea because it was nigh-on impossible to enforce without suspending like 90% of the kids.

That is what is happening. They suspended the Senior class president who was caught with a phone because they were waiting on a college scholarship call.

[–] HiddenLychee@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I graduated about ten years ago so cellphones were popular, but not the same culture we have now. I got suspended because my mom called my phone which I had forgotten to turn off while it was in my locker before school started. Turns out I had forgotten a project so not only did I get suspended, I failed an assignment. Schools are great

[–] halferect@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

How did they get the ok for that? Kids with cell phones can help in active shooter situations so to remove a tool that potentially could save a lot of lives seems crazy

[–] YoBuckStopsHere@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

MAGA invaded the school board. They also banned a ton of books.