this post was submitted on 16 Oct 2023
26 points (100.0% liked)

TechTakes

1480 readers
187 users here now

Big brain tech dude got yet another clueless take over at HackerNews etc? Here's the place to vent. Orange site, VC foolishness, all welcome.

This is not debate club. Unless it’s amusing debate.

For actually-good tech, you want our NotAwfulTech community

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
dgerard@awful.systems
26
Marc Andreesen’s techno-optimist manifesto… (web.archive.org)
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by fasterandworse@awful.systems to c/techtakes@awful.systems
47 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

I don’t really have much to say… it kind of speaks for itself. I do appreciate the table of contents so you don’t get lost in the short paragraphs though

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] sailor_sega_saturn@awful.systems 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

But why is it always Bayes?

Like is it just an excuse to turn off critical thinking by pretending everything's a probability problem with knowable probabilities?

... sorry for the uncertainty above, that was certainly (heh) very human of me. I just updated my priors beep boop. There is a .86748 probability that this is a significant contributing factor alongside Yud swooning.

[–] sue_me_please@awful.systems 7 points 1 year ago

They use Bayes to launder their feels.

[–] swlabr@awful.systems 7 points 1 year ago

I think you’ve got it right. It’s a convenient tool for rationalising ideas that they don’t want to sound irrational, without having to do the requisite critical thinking.