this post was submitted on 16 Oct 2023
31 points (97.0% liked)

Banned Book Club

647 readers
1 users here now

Community dedicated to discussion of banned and challenged books.

ALA Advocacy Page

Banned Books Week

The Palace Project

Please follow this instances rules.

To find more communities on this instance, go to: !411@literature.cafe

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Scholastic found that it either had to give in to the hardliners who wanted to ban books for children or to not allow that, and they seem to have decided to give in.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Arthur 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They could have at least made this "controversial" collection of books opt-out instead of opt-in.

[–] fishos@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Opt in makes it less likely a teacher orders it by accident. And they called it things like "stories of inclusivity". It's pretty on the nose that they support these books and are calling out those who wouldn't as being "uninclusive".

[–] Arthur 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] Arthur 2 points 1 year ago

This situation is just so sad.

[–] fishos@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Just because they're outraged doesn't make them right. Idiots get outraged all the time about things they don't understand. Ask yourself, who is legislating these changes? It's not Scholastic. So why are you acting like they're the ones pushing for this? And ignoring that they didn't call them "banned naughty books". They're called "books on inclusivity". You just want to be outraged instead of thinking it through. Pretty sad on a community about books.

[–] Arthur 1 points 1 year ago

Did you read the article further than the title? It's just a bunch of quotes from people going through the new process. The title is egregious but the content is helpful in understanding why teachers/school admin are frustrated.