politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
view the rest of the comments
That's the whole point of the bogus charges and the whole witch hunt. To lower Donald Trump's re-election chances.
Hilarious!
Wrong term, a witch hunt is an investigation that isn't based off evidence, there is a metric ton of evidence, witnesses, and admission of guilt.
he’s literally on tape flaunting secret materials in front of unauthorized people…this level of cognitive dissonance is truly astounding.
conservative logic: trump is god and can do no wrong
The charges aren’t bogus. It’s not a witch hunt. donald trump is a proven fraud.
Read a book, buddy. Learn something instead of believing in a cult of personality.
Can you provide some reasons why the charges are bogus? Do you believe they lack evidence? Do you think they will be thrown out? One in particular catches my attention as there is a federal case being presided over by a judge he appointed, so also curious how that isn't also bogus in that it's a conflict of interest. I know he's got like 3 different active state and federal cases going so take your time in answering.
I mean, there are so many it's hard to begin. The one regarding his handling of secret materials is something every single high ranking official has done. To put it this way, if other politicians were treated with the same standards as Trump everyone would be under investigations and prosecuted.
Can you show the class where another "high ranking official" kept top secret documents after the government asked for their return? Is the bathroom a valid storage place? Try to answer without consulting fox news.
Heh
Hillary Clinton's private server was stored in a bathroom closet
https://theweek.com/speedreads/572465/hillary-clintons-private-server-stored-bathroom-closet
Also had her aides smash electronic devices with hammers and wipe computer hard drives with bleachbit. Even despite that the Comey investigation found classified stuff on the devices that they could get their hands on.
Is it illegal to have a private server? Guess I don't remember that part of the 600 investigations the Republicans tried running on her. Okay now do the election rigging one. Or how about the one where he's being accused of insurrection and treason for Jan 6?
It's illegal keeping classified stuff on it. Besides, they use it to avoid FOI and other nefarious purposes
I'm curious, how do you feel about Russia losing the war to Ukraine right now?
You do know that destroying electronics is common and procedural for government device and data storage right? When they’re done with it there is a typical process involved for members of government to clean out the old equipment as required.
This unclassified NSA document details incineration of hard drives.
This is common, this is procedure.
They did it after getting subpoenaed, iirc.
That's not an accurate assessment of what happened. See here for a summary: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hillary_Clinton_email_controversy#Deletion_of_emails
Read the indictment. It says he specifically went behind his own lawyers' backs to remove the classified documents from where they were stored and moved them to his personal residence after they had already been subpoenaed. ...and then basically lied to his own lawyers. The prosecution is going to make the case that this was obstruction of justice.
Interesting
Other politicians return those materials when asked rather than try to hide them and lie about what they have.
Trump was given ample opportunity to return the materials without facing charges.
Is that true? What do you mean given ample opportunity
The National Archives were contacting him requesting the documents back for months before any charges were brought forth.
I'll read up on that
He's literally the only republican that would get me and several of my friends to vote Biden again. The charges are all very legitimate, he's going to be convicted. It has nothing to do with him running for president again. I'd bet most of the DNC would love for him to be the candidate again. It's a near gauranteed win and would drive a ton of easy fundraising dollars.
I think he has a very high chance of winning