this post was submitted on 13 Oct 2023
416 points (97.5% liked)

World News

32317 readers
446 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Kben@kbin.social 153 points 1 year ago (7 children)

I feel like im going nuts.We are watching the destructon of a civillian population take place,cheered on by western goverments and media.I just feel sick

[–] takeda@lemmy.world 60 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Is it really cheered?

Most people only agree that the murders on civilians started by Hamas were absolutely horrible and unnecessary. As for what is coming after I don't think normal people are happy about either.

[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 28 points 1 year ago (3 children)

All western mainstream media and western governments are firmly supporting Israel. So, yes the west is actively endorsing genocide here.

[–] Ktastic@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

Politicians are afraid to take stances against Israel because they think their consituents are on Israel's side. Tell them what you think, email them links they cant ignore, call them and explain you know whats up and will call them out for supporting genocide if they don't take everything thats happened into account. It will make a difference. Its the least anyone could do. Posting on social media about your frustrations only is not enough.

[–] Pxtl@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Western governments are supporting Israel because they just got over a thousand people butchered.

They're also asking Israel to show restraint in Palestine. Even the US, Israel's chief arm's dealer, is telling them not to do war crimes. Is it meaningless chin music? Of course. But it's not necessarily an "endorsement".

If your friend sees his kid get grievously hurt, you support him. When he gets his gun, you try to talk him down. Now, the problem in this story is: you gave him that gun.

I don't think the west is endorsing genocide.

I do think that, if it really comes to real actual genocide: They armed it.


edit: I thought that weird name looked familiar, so I figured I'd check. Why are they always vatniks?

https://lemmy.ml/comment/3437882 by https://lemmy.ca/u/yogthos@lemmy.ml

No, I don’t think Putin is draining any swamp, but I do think he runs a far more competent administration than western oligarchs.

(Side note, speaking of WWII: Remember that Soviet flag on the Reichstag picture? That’s of a Ukrainian. Taken by a Ukrainian).

And now thanks to the help from the west Ukraine is run by literal fascists. Maybe something you should reflect on.

In any case, this conversation is clearly pointless since you evidently live in an alternate reality. I’ll just let you figure things out on your own and reconcile the fantasies you’ve built up with the real world as it becomes increasingly more difficult to ignore going forward.

(emphasis mine)

blocked. Life is too short for people like this.

[–] spark947@lemm.ee -2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm hearing this repeated over and over, but its simply not true. CNN is covering it somewhat adequately. Go to their website.

Yes, fox are freaks. Obviously. And that is the most mainstream media. And what is happening in Gaza is a war crime. But it is willful blindness to say it is being reported in nowhere for the mainstream.

[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml -3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Show me where CNN says what's happening in Gaza is a war crime and condemning Israel over it?

[–] spark947@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Its not the job of journalists to make that kind of judgement call. Only to report the facts on The ground. They have written plenty of articles about what Human Rights Watch, EU politicians, UN has to say on the matter.

[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml -3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The fact that what Israel is doing in Gaza is a war crime is a plain fact according to the international law and the UN. The journalists aren't being asked to make this judgment, it's already been made. They're asked to report the facts which they are not. The fact that you feel the need to try and whitewash this really says volumes.

[–] spark947@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

How am I white washing? I have stated repeatedly in my posts that they are indeed warcrimes. I figured that out impression following mainstream media coverage btw.

No, you are only trying to advance a case for all mainstream media being propaganda, blindly, without actually watching or criticizing it. This is ideological, and while it is an effective critique of the modern media landscape, you are using it to lie about the nature of the reporting.

[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml -4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You've just wrote a whole post rationalizing why western media doesn't call war crimes what they are. Weird how these same media outlets have no problems applying such terms in Ukraine. The only one lying here is you bud.

[–] spark947@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Except that when you go back and look at the reporting from an outlet like CNN about Ukraine, that is not true. Sure - there are plenty of reports on how the ICC, and the US and the Ukraine govt. have said that. It's despicable that various US government figures aren't condemning this carpet bombing campaign. But CNN does adhere to at least a little bit of the basics of journalistic integrity - not by much mind you.

[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml -4 points 1 year ago

If you genuinely don't see the difference between how the media covers Ukraine and Palestine, then really don't know what else to say to you.

[–] ModernRisk@lemmy.dbzer0.com 44 points 1 year ago (1 children)

“But they are allowed to defend themselves” says the Western presidents.

This has nothing to do anymore with defending themselves. This is just another path to their genocide mission.

[–] Atomic@sh.itjust.works -4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm curious. Put yourself in Israel's shoes. You've been massively attacked by Hamas from Gaza.

What would you do next? How would you approach this war?

How would you defend yourself to make sure this never happens again.

[–] Ktastic@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If i try to invade your house and take it for myself, if i make you a second class citizen and subject you to constant violence and dehumanization using disproportionate force, you have every right to shoot me in the face.

[–] Ktastic@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If i lock you in an open air prison and arrogantly hold a huge trance festival dorectly outside the walls of your prison that celebrates peace, love, and happiness, with 0 regard for you as a human being, while you and your family waste away under my opression, I'd deserve to be shot, because thats fucking demented, unnecessary and quite frankly, callous to the point of being soulless.

[–] Ktastic@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If i even once had the nerve to suggest the festival celebrated peace between me and the people who are locked in said prison and cant even attend because their race inst allowed outside of those walls, even if they could afford the expensive as fuck tickets, when they are destitute because of being locked in this prison, than that would make me so fucked up, I wouldn't blame anyone for shitting on my corpse afterwards.

[–] Ktastic@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago

And finally, i can say this no problem because its so fucking easy not to do any of these things, even on my worst days of my life, i have no worries that i might be so stupid to do any of these things even for a second.

[–] Sir_Kevin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Both sides are murdering countless innocent civilians. This whole situation is horrible. There are no winners in this war.

[–] jonne@infosec.pub 28 points 1 year ago (5 children)

I'm still baffled by what Hamas was thinking this thing would achieve. It's giving Israel the excuse to completely wipe out Gaza. It's one thing to destroy the wall and attack a military base, but murdering entire villages was only going to have one outcome. It's like they wanted the opposite of Palestinian liberation.

[–] RubberStuntBaby@kbin.social 23 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They want to go out in "a blaze of glory" rather than fade away. Israel has been clearing them out slowly and nobody is stopping it, but if Hamas provokes Israel into doing it quickly maybe that will generate enough outrage that the world will try to stop it.

[–] ArmokGoB@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

My guess is that they wanted to provoke Israel into attacking, hoping that the rest of the nations in the area would use the atrocities as a justification to attack Israel.

[–] jonne@infosec.pub 13 points 1 year ago

They must know that the support for Palestinians by neighbouring countries has only been limited to lip service by most Arab countries for decades. They're all too happy to buy Israeli tech to spy on their own populations, that's basically the bargain they made to stay in power.

There's basically only Iran and Lebanon that are actual "allies", and that's basically more Iran using those groups to make things difficult for the US, and not anything that would actually help Palestinians.

[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It makes perfect sense if you read up on the history of the conflict, particularly over the last 30 years.

Palestine's reward for trying to find a diplomatic solution has been Western-sanctioned destruction and massacre every single time. We westerners have largely ignored that their land has been taken, hospitals and infrastructure bombed, news reporters and civilians shot in cold blood, and no meaningful repercussions for any of it. They've even been blockaded for sixteen years.

Think of it like a smaller-scale Tet Offensive. It didn't seem to make a ton of sense for the Vietnamese to launch an offensive against the South Vietnam and their powerful allies either.

And when you consider how unreasonable it is for 1.1 million people to evacuate in a day, remember also that these people aren't allowed out in the first place.

[–] AceQuorthon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 1 year ago

They're doing the Hitler strategy of taking everyone on the ship down with them, in the hope that it will inspire extremists elsewhere, and to inspire future generations to do the same because surely they are the victims here. Didn't work out that way for Germany in the end now did it?

Also, I'm not saying that Israel is in anyway justified erasing 1.000.000 people off the map. They are also terrible.

[–] blackn1ght@feddit.uk 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This is what I don't get either. Israel's reaction is 100% predictable. They knew their attack would result in thousands of their own people getting killed. Did they have an objective that they thought would help improve the lives of Palestinians living in Gaza?

[–] Grimy@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

If Hamas attacks Israel, Israel's current gov stays in power. If Israel attacks Hamas, Hamas stays in power.

It's in the interest of all in power to keep this going. Peace destroys both their political platforms.

[–] hoshikarakitaridia@sh.itjust.works 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah there's one universal truth in war: everyone loses. Maybe it's their life, their sanity, their resources, or their supporters, but everyone loses.

[–] dangblingus@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 year ago

The ruling class wins.

[–] KingCrimson@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

Me too, it's completely insane