this post was submitted on 03 Oct 2023
159 points (88.8% liked)

Asklemmy

43863 readers
1471 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy ๐Ÿ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] drq@mastodon.ml -2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

@pinkdrunkenelephants Soo... Ultimately, it's *you*, right? Or is there another answer?

[โ€“] pinkdrunkenelephants@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

And then we add on another 30 days, and this court officially rules in favor of your opponent. Discussion over.

It's really that simple. The rest of us are trying to have a functional nation and doing what I just did right now is the best way to handle such disputes, because they force the offending party to stop concern trolling.

๐Ÿค” I should add an actual Good Faith clause to my own hypothetical Constitution, including rules for debates all parties must adhere to in every conversation, just so stuff like that can't happen anymore. Allowing it to go on was one of the root causes of the collapse of the U.S. and stopping people doing that would go a long way toward ensuring it can't happen anymore.

[โ€“] drq@mastodon.ml -2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

@pinkdrunkenelephants Look, I commend and admire the power of thought-terminating cliches, they are useful (and this is part of my point as well), but still, I'd like an honest an answer:

Where Do You Think The Root Of All Authority Is?

I have my answer (or at least what I think describes the answer the best), but I'd like to hear from you.

[โ€“] pinkdrunkenelephants@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I can't hear you over the ruckus of the court bailiffs dragging you out of the courtroom.

๐Ÿง‘โ€โš–๏ธ Next case. Oh god, did Mrs. Dobbs's dog shit all over Jack Smith's front yard again? I swear to god, don't the fucking cleaning robots do anything worth a damn anymore?

[โ€“] drq@mastodon.ml -2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

@pinkdrunkenelephants Okay, whatever, looks like you don't want to think about it, which is also fine, it's kinda tough question.

[โ€“] pinkdrunkenelephants@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You're refusing to think about what I am explaining to you, and you're doing it deliberately because you think the act of disputing a thing disproves a thing, when in fact it does not. The dictionary is gonna be the final authority on what words mean whether you or I like it or not. Words mean what they mean whether we like it or not. Objective reality does not simply go away because you deny it, and any system we build in the future must accept that as a basic tenet to be able to function.

The debate's been over a while ago. I know you're just going to try to keep talking to get the last word though, and that not only is my point, it's also pretty shameful and against the spirit of the thread -- we actually are trying to have friendly and meaningful debates that you're interrupting because you think concern trolling gives your solipsism validity.

Good day.

[โ€“] drq@mastodon.ml -3 points 1 year ago

@pinkdrunkenelephants Solipsism? What?

Do you even understand what I'm trying to say?