this post was submitted on 04 Oct 2023
54 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37730 readers
189 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from !android@lemdro.id

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Thalestr@beehaw.org 30 points 1 year ago (3 children)

15 hours/month is... pretty awful. An avid reader (or listener, in this case) will chew through that in no time at all. Another thing that concerns me is payouts. Spotify is notorious for having atrocious payouts to creators. I wonder how this carries over to their audiobook offerings.

[–] Sharpiemarker@feddit.de 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yep, just looking through my collection of audiobooks, and most are about 10 hours long.

[–] conciselyverbose@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

8-12 are my lighter reads. Some of my favorites are 25-30.

I do do double speed, so I wonder if that ticks twice as fast on there. But 15 hours a month is pretty bad.

Edit: I just got an email from audible. I've listened to ~20900 minutes (348 hours) in 9 months (38.5/month) on there this year, and I've used Scribd and Libby way more. Obviously I'm not typical, and supporting me isn't reasonable. But since they sent that the same day I made this post I thought I'd add it.

[–] joemo@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Knowing Spotify, I would assume it's 15 hours of book regardless of speed listened.

[–] conciselyverbose@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

There's also the possibility that they're the only service out there that doesn't let you control playback speed. Or that they take the most restrictive of playback speed and length of book so people who listen at slowed down speed are screwed too

[–] Resolved3874@lemdro.id 5 points 1 year ago

Yeah when I'm driving a lot for work I could burn through that in 2 days....and not even be able to finish out the second day before I have to change to something else 😂

Another reason to make me glad I setup audiobookshelf.

[–] bug@lemmy.one 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's a free trial. I don't know why everyone's so shocked, they're essentially giving you one or two free books in the hope that you'll be hooked and want to pay for more!

[–] Thalestr@beehaw.org 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Technically not free if you have to have a paid sub in order to access them. In that case it's a paid trial with the opportunity to pay even more. Which sounds even worse for Spotify.

[–] bug@lemmy.one 3 points 1 year ago

Technically yes, but if you're already paying for the thing you actually wanted then it's essentially a free trial on top of that