this post was submitted on 30 Jul 2023
475 points (91.4% liked)

Political Memes

5413 readers
2724 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] C126@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

How many have you talked to? I'm guessing the root cause is your sample size is too small.

[–] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

I can confirm the same.

[–] Kalcifer@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Yeah, OP's argument is founded on a logical fallacy -- it is called a Faulty Generalization.

[–] Speculater@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I've spoken to many libertarians over the years, not one is in support of total decriminalization of all drugs.

[–] Kalcifer@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

Then I would argue that they cannot, in good concience, call themselves libertarians.

[–] RaoulDook@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Hello! Nice to meet you. I support total decriminalization of all drugs. What a human being does with their own body is their own business only. Unless the human is a child who still needs guidance in making those decisions before they have matured enough to do so on their own. In that case the parents should guide them to make safer decisions until adulthood.

Now you have.

[–] Diprount_Tomato@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Because that's absolutely unhinged

[–] Speculater@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

By decriminalizing at a minimum we can get people out of the shadows of crime and maybe into treatment, instead we pay for them to rot in prison because drugs are bad.

[–] Diprount_Tomato@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Then what if they were just kept illegal, dealers get harsh sentences and consumers get treatment?

[–] Speculater@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Because under current laws, consumers that intend to distribute to support the habit, are treated as if they're producers.

[–] Diprount_Tomato@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Current laws where? America is not everywhere

[–] Speculater@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Very few countries treat small-time dealers as victims of their vices. I agree that more drugs is bad, but the "war on drugs" didn't work anywhere. Time to try another approach.

[–] Diprount_Tomato@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Small-time dealers are dealers after all. They're not victims, they're just fuel for this vicious cycle that is drug abuse

[–] Speculater@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

There's your problem, you say drug abuse like most of these people are doing it to spite you. Congratulations on living a life without addiction or having addicts in your family. The reality is much less clear than your fickle black and white perspective.

[–] Diprount_Tomato@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Not a valid excuse to do drugs