this post was submitted on 30 Jul 2023
475 points (91.4% liked)

Political Memes

5429 readers
1658 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] LukeMedia@lemmy.world 25 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Not wearing a seatbelt can harm your passengers in an accident. Based on that alone it's reasonable imo

[–] Kalcifer@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

It could then be argued that it would only be required under the circumstances in which the lack of a seatbelt would create a situation where the safety of others is threatened, and those affected do not consent to the risk.

[–] LukeMedia@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So, whenever you are driving and could possibly get in a wreck.

[–] Kalcifer@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I would say that such a law, when being written, should maintain the original mindset as described in this comment of mine. What I mean by this is to say "whenever you are driving" does not cover the situations in which there would never be (or, at least, extremely unlikely to be) any harm to another except yourself, or those consenting. An example of this woud be offroading -- perhaps you were implying for such laws to only apply when driving on public roads, but this wasn't specified explicitly, so I'm making assumptions.

[–] LukeMedia@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yes, you are correct in both statements. I was not thinking of the more fringe scenarios, I meant specifically public roads.

[–] Kalcifer@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I was not thinking of the more fringe scenarios

Unfortunately, the contention around many laws lies within the gray rather than the black, and white.

[–] LukeMedia@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

You are correct, though I am not a lawyer nor a lawmaker. I'm a guy on the Internet with opinions, and I don't always immediately think of gray areas.