this post was submitted on 29 Jul 2023
58 points (100.0% liked)

City Life

2114 readers
1 users here now

All topics urbanism and city related, from urban planning to public transit to municipal interest stuff. Both automobile and FuckCars inclusive.

This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
alyaza@beehaw.org
Butterbee@beehaw.org
aponigricon@beehaw.org
remington@beehaw.org
58
If We Want a Shift to Walking, We Need To Prioritize Dignity (www.strongtowns.org)
submitted 1 year ago by haxe11@beehaw.org to c/citylife@beehaw.org
14 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Have you ever had a friend return from a vacation and gush about how great it was to walk in the place they’d visited? “You can walk everywhere! To a café, to the store. It was amazing!” Immediately after saying that, your friend hops in their car and drives across the parking lot to the Starbucks to which they could easily have walked.

Why does walking feel so intuitive when we’re in a city built before cars, yet as soon as we return home, walking feels like an unpleasant chore that immediately drives us into a car?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] admiralteal@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It's notable that there's vanishingly little evidence that more lanes is correlated with reduced trip times or less congestion for people in cars. I'm not even talking about things like induced demand -- just that literally, sometimes turning a 4-lane into a 2-lane or a 6-lane into a 4-lane has minimal impact on trip times on that road. All the world of "road diets" usually makes driving better, not worse.

The more lanes there are, the more points of automobile conflict. Points of conflict are the seeds of congestion.