this post was submitted on 25 Sep 2023
1269 points (89.3% liked)

Political Memes

5429 readers
1533 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
1269
Indistinguishable! (i.postimg.cc)
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by ZeroCool@feddit.ch to c/politicalmemes@lemmy.world
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ignotum@lemmy.world 63 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Is your capitalist country gonna be democratic? If so, what about the people that will vote for the socialist party? What If the socialist party gains popular support? Will capitalism just step aside?

[–] Rozauhtuno@lemmy.blahaj.zone 12 points 1 year ago

What If the socialist party gains popular support? Will capitalism just step aside?

80% of South America: hahahahaha coups go brrrrrrrr

[–] heimchen@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Just do it like the Romans, Only the riche really have the right to vote

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago

That's basically how it already is in the US.

While poor people officially have the right to vote, deliberate voter suppression makes it difficult to impossible for tens of millions of them and easy for anyone living in a sparsely populated, rich, and overwhelmingly white area, even letting some of them vote in country clubs.

Then even if they DO manage to vote, it's largely symbolic since corruption in the form of several kinds of legal bribes is the norm rather than the exception, leading to policies favoring the rich to the point of almost disenfranchising all poor people and de facto disenfranchisement of everyone whose policy positions are to the left of "free market" myths.

Tl;Dr: it's a de facto oligarchic kakistocracy ruled by rich people through pet politicians who are themselves much richer on average than the general population.

[–] ignotum@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Rich, male and own property* if i remember correctly

And i don't think the romans were the first nor the last to enforce those kinds of limits, rich men who owned property have been huge fans of that system throughout the ages

[–] orrk@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago

Actually, white and male wasn't part of the requirements, In the roman system every family had a vote, along with every tribe (Rome saw them as family), now commonly the leader of the family was a man who served in the roman army, and most commonly white because of where the Romans were, but the southern Rome had a few black (what we would consider sub-Saharan Africans) and many Arab families (tribes), it was also not uncommon for the wife to become head of the family if the men were in the legion or dead