Asklemmy

43826 readers

844 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

Open-ended question
Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

Lemmyverse: community search
sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
!lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

What would be FOSS equivalent for hardware ? (lemmy.world)

submitted 1 year ago by bullshitter@lemmy.world to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml

26 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Just like we have software developed by the community, for the community. Can we have the same ideology applied to hardware ?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] DickShaney@lemmy.blahaj.zone 63 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Open plans and schematics, interoperable, standardized. I should be able to unplug a component from my computer and plug it into another one. I should be able to replace broken parts. I should be able to, if feasible, make it myself with off the shelf components.

[–] hardypart@feddit.de 26 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Let's appreciate general purpose computers before the war against them will be successful.

https://en.m.wikisource.org/wiki/The_Coming_War_on_General_Computation

[–] xhieron@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I can't believe I'd never read that before despite being a fan of Doctorow in general. Thank you. Exceptional work. Should be mandatory reading.

[–] med@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago

There’s a great talk on the same topic he gave at the Long Now Foundation back in 2012, the Q and A adds a bit to the users vs owners chat

[–] Bipta@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

Thank you. So, last year, the Lower Merion School District, in a middle-class, affluent suburb of Philadelphia found itself in a great deal of trouble, because it was caught distributing PCs to its students, equipped with rootkits that allowed for remote covert surveillance through the computer's camera and network connection.

That was THIRTEEN YEARS ago?!

[–] waldek@lemmy.86thumbs.net 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Quite a good follow up talk posted not so long ago.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rimtaSgGz_4

[–] PipedLinkBot@feddit.rocks 1 points 1 year ago

Here is an alternative Piped link(s):

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rimtaSgGz_4

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I'm open-source, check me out at GitHub.

[–] schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I admit I have only skimmed this yet, but that was 12 years ago. Back then, copyright was a major problem for a free and open society in which people could freely communicate.

The world has changed since then. Those opposed to such a society are now more likely to talk about disinformation, radicalization, child porn, hate speech rather than copyright. Those pretexts aren't really any better of course.

[–] saigot@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago

I think the most compelling reason will be performance.

In enterprise is already soldering ram directly onto the chip, it's only a matter of time until the same goes for consumer tech. Fusing the chip to the board has benefits too. When most people don't ever upgrade or repair their computer a 10% speed increase that makes upgrading impossible just makes good business sense.